Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Phylogenetic tree-building

D A Morrison1

  • 1Molecular Parasitology Unit, University of Technology Sydney, Gore Hill, NSW, Australia. davidm@bio.uts.edu.au

International Journal for Parasitology
|June 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complete Genome Sequence of Streptococcus pneumoniae Serotype 19F Strain EF3030.

Microbiology resource announcements·2019
Same author

High-resolution profiles of the Streptococcus mitis CSP signaling pathway reveal core and strain-specific regulated genes.

BMC genomics·2018
Same author

Comprehensive Transcriptome Profiles of <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> UA159 Map Core Streptococcal Competence Genes.

mSystems·2016
Same author

Genome editing by natural genetic transformation in Streptococcus mutans.

Journal of microbiological methods·2015
Same author

Potential effect of 'cut-off intensity' on correlation between light meter measurements and time outdoors.

Eye (London, England)·2013
Same author

Sequencing of the β-tubulin genes in the ascarid nematodes Parascaris equorum and Ascaridia galli.

Molecular and biochemical parasitology·2013
Same journal

Hidden digenean diversity in two African protected areas: metabarcoding as a tool for parasite identification.

International journal for parasitology·2026
Same journal

Nearly Bitten, Twice Shy: Effects of prior and current parasite exposure on host mating behaviour.

International journal for parasitology·2026
Same journal

Bringing order to chaos: A new classification of avian schistosomes and their genetic lineages in the context of swimmer's itch.

International journal for parasitology·2026
Same journal

Assessing myxozoan diversity in fish: microscopy-based detection versus high-throughput amplicon sequencing.

International journal for parasitology·2026
Same journal

Spatial expression analysis and target prediction give insight into microRNA function in the model cestode Hymenolepis microstoma.

International journal for parasitology·2026
Same journal

Climatic suitability and phylogeography reveal cryptic diversity and public health risk in the Amblyomma testudinarium complex and other Asian Amblyomma.

International journal for parasitology·2026
See all related articles

Cladistic analysis reconstructs evolutionary history by grouping taxa based on shared derived traits. While many methods exist, no single approach is ideal due to data complexities and incongruent characters.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Systematics
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • Cladistic analysis is a method for reconstructing evolutionary relationships.
  • It groups organisms based on shared derived character states, forming nested clades.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the principles of cladistic analysis.
  • To discuss the challenges posed by incongruent data in phylogeny reconstruction.
  • To review various tree-building methods and their limitations.

Main Methods:

  • Searching for nested groups of shared derived character states.
  • Utilizing cladograms (branching diagrams) to represent phylogenetic hypotheses.
  • Evaluating different tree-building methods for phylogeny reconstruction.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Phylogenetic tree reconstruction is complicated by incongruent characters in real data.
  • A variety of tree-building methods have been developed to address data incongruence.
  • No single method is simultaneously efficient, powerful, consistent, and robust.

Conclusions:

  • Many tree-building methods perform well under various conditions.
  • The UPGMA and Invariants methods are exceptions and generally perform poorly.
  • Choosing the appropriate phylogenetic reconstruction method depends on the specific data and research question.