Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An Australian model for professional standards

S F Cowell1, M Rinks, I F Egan

  • 1Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medical Radiation Technology, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia.

Radiologic Technology
|September 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lived experiences of first-year radiation therapy students communicating with patients and radiation therapists - A qualitative review using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2021
Same author

Effect of communication skills training on radiation therapy student's confidence and interactions during their first clinical placement.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2020
Same author

Radiation therapist health literacy training: A qualitative study exploring perceived barriers and attitudes.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2020
Same author

Radiation therapist health literacy training: Does learning alternate communication methods translate into improved confidence in patient interactions?

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2020
Same author

Communication: Preparing undergraduate radiation therapy students for initial clinical patient interactions.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2019
Same author

Implementation of an image-guided radiation therapy program: Lessons learnt and future challenges.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2010
Same journal

An Intentional and Ethical Integration of AI in Medical Imaging.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Benefits of Integrating AI Into Computer-Aided Detection Systems.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Analysis of Chest Computed Tomography.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

A Practice-Aligned Approach to Integrating AI in Radiation Sciences Education.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Site Visitors: The Unsung Heroes of the Accreditation Process.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Extended Reality Innovations in Medical Imaging Education.

Radiologic technology·2026
See all related articles

This study outlines qualitative research methods for creating entry-level professional standards for Australian medical radiation scientists. The developed Australian model offers a validated approach for professional standards, adaptable for international use.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Radiation Science
  • Allied Health Professions
  • Professional Standards Development

Background:

  • Establishing clear entry-level standards is crucial for medical radiation science professions.
  • Australia has developed a unique model for defining these professional standards.
  • Previous standards development may not have fully captured the scope of practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the qualitative research methodologies employed in developing entry-level standards for Australian medical radiation science professions.
  • To present the Australian model for professional standards validation.
  • To discuss the utility of these standards and the adaptability of the development methodology.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative research methodologies were utilized.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A mix of complementary research tools were employed for validation.
  • The research focused on entry-level standards for four specific professions.

    • Main Results:

    • A comprehensive set of entry-level standards documents were successfully developed.
    • The Australian model effectively validated the range and level of professional standards.
    • The research identified the beneficial role of these standards in professional practice.

    Conclusions:

    • The described methodologies provide a robust framework for developing professional standards in medical radiation science.
    • The Australian model offers a validated approach that could be adopted or adapted by other countries.
    • Implementing these standards is expected to enhance the medical radiation science professions.