Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical issues in the search for repressed memories

H Merskey1

  • 1University of Western Ontario, London.

American Journal of Psychotherapy
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Repression and dissociation concepts lack scientific evidence, potentially leading to false memories in recovered-memory (RM) treatments. RM therapy may harm patients and requires legislative attention.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Con: impairment listing for pain in social security disability determination.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2014
Same author

The history of pain and hysteria.

NeuroRehabilitation·2014
Same author

Illness episodes and service delivery in the hudson bay and james bay region.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

"Alice in numberland"?

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

Re: Kasch et al. Temporomandibular disorders after whiplash injury: a controlled prospective study 2002;16:118-128.

Journal of orofacial pain·2002
Same author

Profiles of cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease.

Alzheimer disease and associated disorders·2002

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychiatry
  • Memory Studies

Background:

  • Concepts of repression and dissociation are currently debated, with questions about scientific evidence for repression.
  • Dissociation, proposed as an alternative, faces logical challenges regarding its underlying mechanisms.
  • The idea of repressed childhood memories recovered later conflicts with established memory science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the scientific validity of repression and dissociation concepts.
  • To analyze the implications of recovered-memory (RM) treatments, particularly concerning false memory syndrome.
  • To discuss the ethical and legislative considerations surrounding RM therapy and its impact on traditional psychotherapy.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of repression and dissociation theories.
Keywords:
Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act 1973Mental Health TherapiesProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of clinical practices in recovered-memory treatments.
  • Analysis of case studies and legal/legislative developments related to RM therapy.

    • Main Results:

    • Scientific evidence for repression is lacking; the concept is considered anecdotal.
    • Recovered-memory treatments may induce false memories through suggestion, leading to unfounded accusations.
    • RM therapy can result in patient deterioration and is at odds with traditional psychotherapy principles.

    Conclusions:

    • The scientific basis for repression and dissociation in the context of memory recovery is questionable.
    • Recovered-memory treatments pose risks, including the creation of false memories and patient harm.
    • Informed consent, legislative action, and a re-evaluation of RM therapy's impact on mental healthcare are necessary.