Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Hemodynamic effects of different pacing ratios in chronic dynamic double cardiomyoplasty
E R Soltero1, D H Glaeser, L H Michael
1Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Insights
Pacing skeletal muscle every other beat during dynamic cardiomyoplasty yields similar hemodynamic results to pacing every beat. This less frequent stimulation may preserve muscle function and improve patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Skeletal Muscle Physiology
Background:
- Dynamic cardiomyoplasty is a clinical treatment for heart failure, with varying stimulation protocols.
- Concerns exist regarding potential negative effects of frequent muscle stimulation (1:1 muscle:heart ratio).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of two pacing ratios (1:1 vs. 1:2) on hemodynamic parameters in a canine model of double cardiomyoplasty.
Main Methods:
- Double latissimus dorsi cardiomyoplasty was performed in 11 dogs.
- Cardiac failure was induced, and hemodynamic variables were measured under 1:1 and 1:2 pacing ratios.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in most hemodynamic parameters between the 1:1 and 1:2 pacing ratios.
- A significant difference was observed in left ventricular pressure and its first derivative (dP/dt) between the two ratios.
Conclusions:
- Pacing every other beat (1:2) in dynamic cardiomyoplasty demonstrates statistically similar hemodynamic results to pacing every beat (1:1).
- Less frequent stimulation may preserve latissimus dorsi muscle function, potentially enhancing clinical outcomes without sacrificing hemodynamic benefits.
Background:
Dynamic cardiomyoplasty is being used clinically worldwide, and evaluated by a clinical trial (phase III) in the United States. Some centers stimulate the skeletal muscle wrap with every heart beat (1:1 [muscle:heart]), whereas others use every other heart beat (1:2). Recent concern over the possible deleterious effects of too-frequent stimulation of the muscles motivated the attempt to evaluate, in a canine model of chronic, double cardiomyoplasty, the effects of two different pacing ratios on several hemodynamic parameters of interest.
Methods:
Double cardiomyoplasty was performed using both latissimus dorsi muscles in 11 dogs. Fatigue resistance was achieved using the clinical transformation protocol. At a final experiment, acute cardiac failure was induced by administration of propranolol. Hemodynamic measurements of eight physiologic variables were averaged over complete pacing cycles, including the nonpaced beat at a 1:2 pacing ratio.
Results:
The net effects of latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation at each of two pacing ratios were compared using nonparametric statistics. With the exception of left ventricular pressure (p = 0.0262) and its first derivative, dP/dt (p = 0.0099), there was no significant difference between hemodynamic performance at the two pacing ratios.
Conclusions:
In this canine model, pacing every other beat produces hemodynamic results that are statistically similar to pacing every beat. Less frequent stimulation of the latissimus dorsi muscle may preserve its function and improve clinical results without compromising hemodynamic benefit.

