Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Making a CPR practice decision based on research

E Nahigian, A M Tutuska, M A Wieser

    The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association
    |June 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Palliative care program uses self-assessment tool.

    Hospital case management : the monthly update on hospital-based care planning and critical paths·2001
    Same author

    How to build teams in the midst of change.

    Nursing management·1998
    Same author

    Competency based evaluation: one hospital's approach.

    Journal of nursing staff development : JNSD·1997
    Same author

    Providing and evaluating clinical experiences for nursing education programs.

    Journal of nursing staff development : JNSD·1996
    Same author

    Tracking quality assurance activities: development of an administrative model.

    Journal of nursing quality assurance·1987
    Same author

    Assessing early father-infant attachment.

    MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing·1984
    Same journal

    The answer is questions: accelerated-nursing students report practice questions are fundamental to first-time NCLEX-RN success.

    The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association·2015
    Same journal

    Psychosocial needs of cancer patients living in the Adirondacks: a needs assessment.

    The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association·2015
    Same journal

    Perspectives on academic misconduct: implications for education and practice.

    The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association·2015
    Same journal

    Patients tell the story: interrelationships among patient satisfaction, communications with providers, and emergency department care.

    The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association·2015
    Same journal

    Revisiting professional ethics and the nursing care model in an era of healthcare reform.

    The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association·2015
    Same journal

    Transforming the nursing workforce in New York: the value of baccalaureate preparation in nursing.

    The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association·2014
    See all related articles

    Instructor observation and critique of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) manikin skills showed no significant difference compared to manikin-generated strips. This finding supports discontinuing reliance on CPR strips for evaluating satisfactory manikin practice performance.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Emergency Medicine
    • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training

    Background:

    • Traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training evaluation often relies on manikin-generated strips.
    • Instructor observation provides a qualitative assessment of CPR skills.
    • There is a need to validate alternative or complementary evaluation methods in CPR training.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the effectiveness of instructor observation versus manikin-generated strips in evaluating CPR manikin performance.
    • To validate the decision to move away from sole reliance on manikin-generated strips for CPR skill assessment.
    • To determine if significant differences exist between two CPR evaluation methodologies.

    Main Methods:

    • Blind collection of one-rescuer and two-rescuer CPR strips from participants over six months.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of CPR techniques through direct instructor observation and critique of key skill elements.
  • Statistical analysis to compare the outcomes of instructor observation and manikin-generated strip review.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant difference (p > or = .05) was found between CPR evaluation methods.
    • Instructor observation and manikin-generated strips yielded comparable results in assessing CPR performance.
    • The study found consistency between the two evaluation techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • Instructor observation is a valid method for evaluating CPR manikin skills.
    • Reliance on manikin-generated strips for documenting satisfactory CPR performance can be discontinued.
    • Current CPR training evaluation methods can be streamlined without compromising skill assessment quality.