Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal

T G Morales1, R E Sampliner, H S Garewal

  • 1Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, USA.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Endoscopic estimation of colon polyp size is significantly larger than actual measurements after removal. This overestimation, averaging 1.6 mm, impacts cancer risk assessment and clinical studies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systematic review: the role of bile acids in the pathogenesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and related neoplasia.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2011
Same author

Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2010
Same author

Clinical trial: lansoprazole 15 or 30 mg once daily vs. placebo for treatment of frequent nighttime heartburn in self-treating subjects.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2009
Same author

Discrepancy in the assessment of tumor response in patients with pancreatic cancer: WHO versus RECIST criteria.

Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology·2008
Same author

Decreasing prevalence combined with increasing eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in the United States has not resulted in fewer hospital admissions for peptic ulcer disease-related complications.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2007
Same author

Barrett esophagus.

Current opinion in gastroenterology·2006

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Medical Measurement

Background:

  • Accurate colon polyp size is crucial for cancer risk assessment in clinical settings and for individual patient management.
  • Discrepancies between endoscopic estimation and actual polyp size can affect clinical decisions and research outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the difference between endoscopic estimations of colon polyp size and their actual measurements post-removal.
  • To determine if endoscopic polyp size assessment is reliable for clinical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • 31 pedunculated colon polyps were measured endoscopically using biopsy forceps as a guide.
  • Polyps were removed via snare polypectomy and measured by a blinded technician.
  • Pathologists also measured fixed polyps, blinded to prior measurements.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Endoscopic estimates were significantly larger than postpolypectomy measurements, averaging 1.6 mm greater (18% difference).
  • 74% of endoscopic estimates overestimated polyp size compared to postpolypectomy measurements.
  • No significant difference was found between postpolypectomy and formalin-fixed polyp measurements.

Conclusions:

  • Endoscopic estimation of colon polyp size tends to overestimate actual dimensions.
  • The discrepancy is likely due to factors inherent in the in vivo polyp removal process.
  • Accurate measurement post-removal is essential for reliable cancer risk assessment.