Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computerized test development software a comparative review

J M Kirkpatrick1, D M Billings, K H Carlton

  • 1Purdue University School of Nursing, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1337, USA. mrsees@omni.cc.purdue.edu

Computers in Nursing
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association between anaemia and hospital readmissions in patients undergoing major surgery requiring postoperative intensive care.

Anaesthesia·2022
Same author

Creating a model to predict time intervals from induction of labor to induction of anesthesia and delivery to coordinate workload.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2021
Same author

Need for additional anesthesia after single injection spinal analgesia for labor: a retrospective cohort study.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2019
Same author

Association between exposure to anaesthesia and surgery and long-term cognitive trajectories in older adults: report from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same author

Postoperative delirium in elderly patients is associated with subsequent cognitive impairment.

British journal of anaesthesia·2017
Same author

Association between neuraxial analgesia, cancer progression, and mortality after radical prostatectomy: a large, retrospective matched cohort study.

British journal of anaesthesia·2013
Same journal

Medi-Sim Multimedia: AACN Critical Care-Hematological System.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Managing Information in Healthcare: Concepts and Cases.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Using online learning in a traditional face-to-face environment.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

The "big bang" implementation: not for the faint of heart.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

Homebound older adults' experiences with the Internet and e-mail.

Computers in nursing·2002
Same journal

A study of factors related to the use of online resources by nurse educators.

Computers in nursing·2002
See all related articles

Nurse educators can choose from many computerized test development programs. This review compares seven options based on usability, psychometric properties, security, and system needs to aid informed selection.

Area of Science:

  • Educational Technology
  • Nursing Education
  • Assessment and Evaluation

Background:

  • Nurse educators require effective technology for test development and administration.
  • A wide array of computerized test development programs are available.
  • Selecting the appropriate software is crucial for efficient and reliable testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comparative review of seven commercially available computerized test development programs.
  • To evaluate these programs based on key criteria relevant to nurse educators.
  • To inform the decision-making process for adopting new testing technologies.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of seven distinct computerized test development programs.
  • Evaluation criteria included ease of use, psychometric properties, security features, and system requirements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of implementation challenges for both test development and administration.

    • Main Results:

    • Detailed review of A+ Test Manager and Test Taker, AUTOGENT, CATSoftware System, LXR*TEST, MicroCAT, Question Designer for Windows, and Test Construction Set.
    • Analysis highlights differences in usability, psychometric rigor, security protocols, and technical specifications.
    • Identified common issues and considerations for program implementation.

    Conclusions:

    • Nurse educators must align software capabilities with their specific educational goals and institutional context.
    • Informed selection requires understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each program.
    • Strategic implementation is key to maximizing the benefits of computerized testing in nursing education.