Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Practical aspects of acoustic rhinometry: problems and solutions

E W Fisher1, D P Morris, J M Biemans

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Rhinology
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Optimizing acoustic rhinometry technique is crucial for accurate nasal geometry assessment. Standardizing procedures like nosepiece seal and wave tube angle ensures reliable measurements for rhinology research and clinical applications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and psychometric validation of the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Control Test.

Rhinology·2025
Same author

Indication for biologics in a real-world cohort of dupilumab treated chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps patients according to international recommendations: evidence from the European CRS Outcome Registry (CHRINOSOR).

Rhinology·2025
Same author

Pocket guide: biologics in upper and lower airways in adults.

Rhinology·2025
Same author

Remission in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

Rhinology·2025
Same author

Nasal endoscopy score thresholds to trigger consideration of chronic rhinosinusitis treatment escalation and implications for disease control.

Rhinology·2024
Same author

EPOS2020/EUFOREA expert opinion on defining disease states and therapeutic goals in CRSwNP.

Rhinology·2024

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Medical instrumentation
  • Respiratory physiology

Background:

  • Acoustic rhinometry (AR) is a key tool for nasal geometry measurement in rhinology.
  • Standardized techniques are essential for reliable and reproducible AR data.
  • Variations in AR methodology can significantly impact nasal cavity measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of various technical parameters on acoustic rhinometry measurements.
  • To provide guidance on preferred procedures for optimizing AR technique.
  • To enhance the reliability and clinical applicability of acoustic rhinometry.

Main Methods:

  • Studied effects of nosepiece seal quality, aperture diameter, wave tube inclination (axial and coronal planes), and palate position.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined 100 nasal cavities (50 normal, 50 pathological) in adults and children.
  • Assessed reproducibility and statistical significance of parameter variations.

    • Main Results:

    • Wave tube angle significantly altered anterior nasal cavity traces and minimum cross-sectional area (MCA).
    • Small nosepiece apertures accentuated the I-notch, sometimes making the nosepiece the MCA site.
    • Silicone sealant reduced nasal volume by 14.3% with suboptimal seals; palate elevation reduced nasopharyngeal volume by 28.6%.

    Conclusions:

    • Acoustic rhinometry is highly sensitive to technical procedural details.
    • Recommendations include intermediate wave tube angles, sealant use for suspect seals, improved nosepieces, and synchronized breathing.
    • International standardization of AR techniques is needed for collaborative research and clinical use.