Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

General concepts about cell sorting techniques

A Orfao1, A Ruiz-Arguelles

  • 1Servicio General de Citometria, University of Salamanca, Spain.

Clinical Biochemistry
|February 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison between five pattern-based approaches for automated diagnostic classification of mature/peripheral B-cell neoplasms based on standardized EuroFlow flow cytometry immunophenotypic data.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

A decision-tree approach for the differential diagnosis of chronic lymphoid leukemias and peripheral B-cell lymphomas.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2019
Same author

Self-reported changes in the expanded disability status scale score in patients with multiple sclerosis after autologous stem cell transplants: real-world data from a single center.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2019
Same author

From big flow cytometry datasets to smart diagnostic strategies: The EuroFlow approach.

Journal of immunological methods·2019
Same author

Impact of blood storage and sample handling on quality of high dimensional flow cytometric data in multicenter clinical research.

Journal of immunological methods·2019
Same author

Next generation flow for minimally-invasive blood characterization of MGUS and multiple myeloma at diagnosis based on circulating tumor plasma cells (CTPC).

Blood cancer journal·2018
Same journal

Analytical outlier rates for Roche fifth generation cardiac troponin T stat using biotin sensitive and insensitive reagent lots.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of hemoglobin interference thresholds for chemical urinalysis panels.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Integrated genomic and biochemical diagnosis of a novel homozygous start-loss variant in AKR1D1 associated with neonatal cholestasis.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Agreement between POC glucose meters and blood gas analyzers varies across ICU patient populations.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

From variability to value: Advancing vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring toward decision-grade practice through commutability-informed external quality assessment and uncertainty-aware reporting.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Response to the letter to the editor: From variability to value: Advancing vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring toward decision-grade practice through commutability-informed external quality assessment and uncertainty-aware reporting.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
See all related articles

Cell sorting methods are crucial for cell analysis. Bulk sorters offer high throughput, while fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) by flow cytometry (FCM) provides superior purity and recovery for specific cell subsets.

Area of Science:

  • Cell Biology
  • Biotechnology
  • Clinical Laboratory Science

Background:

  • Cellular analysis often necessitates isolating specific cell types or subcellular components.
  • Numerous cell sorting methods are available for clinical laboratory applications.
  • These methods broadly fall into bulk sorters and single-cell-based sorters, such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) via flow cytometry (FCM).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare and contrast bulk cell sorting methods with single-cell-based methods like FACS by FCM.
  • To elucidate the differences in cell classification, sorting mechanisms, and their impact on purity and recovery.
  • To guide the selection of appropriate cell sorting techniques based on experimental needs.

Main Methods:

  • Classification of cell sorting techniques into bulk and single-cell-based categories.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the sequential versus single-step processes in cell classification and sorting.
  • Evaluation of throughput rates and the number of parameters utilized for cell characterization.

    • Main Results:

    • Bulk sorters typically use a single cell characteristic and offer higher throughput.
    • FACS by FCM allows simultaneous use of multiple parameters for cell classification.
    • Single-cell-based methods, like FACS by FCM, generally yield higher purity and recovery rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Bulk separation is often used for sample enrichment or as a preparative step for FCM.
    • FACS by FCM is preferred when high purity and recovery of specific cell subpopulations are critical.
    • The choice between bulk and FACS by FCM depends on the balance between throughput, purity, and recovery requirements.