Related Experiment Videos
Identifying thresholds for classifying childhood psychiatric disorder: issues and prospects
M H Boyle1, D R Offord, Y Racine
1Department of Psychiatry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
|November 1, 1996
Summary
Choosing different thresholds for classifying childhood disorders significantly impacts prevalence, reliability, and agreement estimates. These variations profoundly affect our understanding of childhood psychiatric disorder epidemiology.
Area of Science:
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- Developmental Psychology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Accurate classification of childhood psychiatric disorders is crucial for epidemiological studies.
- Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and conduct disorder (CD) are common childhood conditions.
- The selection of diagnostic thresholds can influence study outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To empirically assess the impact of varying classification thresholds for ADHD and CD.
- To evaluate how threshold choices affect prevalence estimates, reliability, and informant agreement.
- To examine the implications for comorbidity and associated features of these disorders.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from parent and teacher checklist assessments of children aged 6–16 years (N=1,229) from a general population sample.
- Included structured interviews from a stratified, random subsample (n=251).
- Analyzed data based on different rationales for setting disorder classification thresholds.
Main Results:
- Prevalence estimates for childhood disorders varied widely (0.1% to 39.2%) based on threshold choices.
- Test-retest reliability (kappa) ranged from .19 to .82.
- Parent-teacher agreement (kappa) varied from .0 to .38, and relative odds for associated features changed significantly.
Conclusions:
- The rationale used for setting diagnostic thresholds has profound implications for childhood disorder epidemiology.
- Variability in threshold selection can lead to substantially different conclusions about disorder prevalence and characteristics.
- Emphasizes the need for standardized or clearly justified threshold criteria in research.