Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Factors predicting successful labor induction

W J Watson1, D Stevens, S Welter

  • 1Department of Perinatal medicine, Sioux Valley Hospital, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
|December 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New Measurements of the Deuteron-to-Proton F_{2} Structure-Function Ratio.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Concussion risk and symptomology severity in adolescents are associated with pre-season drowsiness and emotional complaints.

South African journal of sports medicine·2024
Same author

Novel Measurement of the Neutron Magnetic Form Factor from A=3 Mirror Nuclei.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients with metastatic cancer in the Asia-Pacific region: a report from the APODDC working group.

ESMO open·2023
Same author

4-dimensional local radial basis function interpolation of large, uniformly spaced datasets.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2022
Same journal

The Political Determinants of Obstetric Prescribing.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Adverse Maternal Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Milestones in Motion: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Ebola Virus in Pregnancy.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

A Quality-Improvement Study Evaluating Three Postpartum Prophylactic Oxytocin Rates and Blood Loss After Vaginal Birth.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Climate Change on Obstetric and Gynecologic Health.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Cervical dilation is the only factor that predicts latent-phase labor length during induction. Maternal parity and sonographic cervical length do not provide significant additional predictive information for labor induction.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Clinical Prediction Models

Background:

  • Predicting labor induction duration is crucial for optimizing patient care and resource allocation.
  • The Bishop score components and sonographic cervical length are commonly assessed, but their independent predictive value for latent-phase labor length requires clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify which factors, including maternal parity, sonographic cervical length, and Bishop score components, best predict the duration of latent-phase labor in women undergoing labor induction.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study enrolled 109 women undergoing labor induction.
  • Data collected included cervical position, consistency, effacement, dilation, fetal station, maternal parity, and sonographic cervical length.
  • Multiple regression analysis was employed to determine predictive factors for latent-phase labor length.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A predictive model incorporating seven factors was significant (F = 32.1, P < .001).
  • Backward stepwise regression revealed cervical dilation as the sole independent predictor of latent-phase labor length.
  • A significant correlation was observed between clinical cervical effacement and sonographic cervical length (r = -0.523, P < .001).

Conclusions:

  • Cervical dilation is the primary predictor of latent-phase labor duration.
  • Sonographic evaluation of cervical length and maternal parity do not offer significant independent predictive value for latent-phase labor length in this cohort.