Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of six deconvolution techniques

F N Madden¹, K R Godfrey, M J Chappell

¹Department of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics

|June 1, 1996

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Assessing the efficacy, safety and utility of fully closed-loop insulin delivery compared to standard insulin therapy with a continuous glucose monitor in adults with type 2 diabetes (COYOTE study): a randomised parallel study protocol.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Patient-reported outcomes for older adults on CamAPS FX closed loop system.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2023

Same author

Parents' experiences of caring for a young child with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative evidence.

BMC pediatrics·2021

Same author

Resistant Starch Production and Glucose Release from Pre-Prepared Chilled Food: The SPUD Project.

Nutrition bulletin·2021

Same author

Adolescents' and their parents' experiences of using a closed-loop system to manage type 1 diabetes in everyday life: qualitative study.

Chronic illness·2021

Same author

Estimated HbA<sub>1c</sub> and glucose management indicator (GMI): are they the same?

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2020

Same journal

Integrated equation to evaluate accumulation profiles of drugs eliminated by Michaelis-Menten kinetics.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010

Same journal

Applications of a recirculatory stochastic pharmacokinetic model: limitations of compartmental models.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010

Same journal

Effect of plasma protein and tissue binding on the time course of drug concentration in plasma.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010

Same journal

Pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in solid tumors.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010

Same journal

Single- and multiple-dose kinetics of oral lorazepam in humans: the predictability of accumulation.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010

Same journal

Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo release of digoxin from four different soft gelatin capsule formulations.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010

See all related articles

This study compares six deconvolution techniques using simulated noisy data to recover input functions. Performance evaluation via error measures aids in selecting optimal deconvolution methods for signal processing applications.

Area of Science:

Signal Processing
Computational Mathematics

Background:

Deconvolution is crucial for extracting signals from noisy, convolved data.
Various mathematical and algorithmic approaches exist for deconvolution.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the performance of six distinct deconvolution techniques.
To evaluate their effectiveness in extracting input functions from simulated noisy data with known impulse responses.

Main Methods:

Methods evaluated include Fourier transforms, system identification, constrained optimization, cubic splines, maximum entropy, and genetic algorithms.
Simulated noisy data were generated by convolving known impulse responses with five input functions.
Each algorithm was tested on 500 datasets, with performance quantified by defined error measures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Quantitative comparison of the six deconvolution techniques based on simulated data.
Identification of methods with superior performance in specific noise conditions or data types.

Conclusions:

The study provides empirical evidence on the relative strengths and weaknesses of different deconvolution algorithms.
Findings can guide the selection of appropriate deconvolution techniques in practical signal processing scenarios.