Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Error detection and reduction in blood banking

T L Motschman1, S B Moore

  • 1Division of Transfusion Medicine, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
|December 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Presensitization patterns in renal allograft recipients-A correlation with graft outcome.

Irish journal of medical science·2016
Same author

Red blood cell transfusion in a patient with anti-AnWj: a case report.

Immunohematology·2007
Same author

Transplant glomerulopathy: subclinical incidence and association with alloantibody.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2007
Same author

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in pathologically proven multiple sclerosis: frequency, stability and clinicopathologic correlations.

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)·2007
Same author

Kidney transplantation in patients with antibodies against donor HLA class II.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2007
Same author

Histologic findings one year after positive crossmatch or ABO blood group incompatible living donor kidney transplantation.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2006
Same journal

Advances in Hemostasis Laboratory Testing.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Extracellular Vesicles in Hemostasis.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Thrombin Generation Assay: Ready for Prime Time.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Viscoelastic Testing for the Laboratorian: Recent Advances and Practical Advice.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Recommendations for Harmonization of Hemostasis Testing Across Hospital Sites.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

The Role of Hypoxia in Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction and Venous Thromboembolism.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Effective error management in facilities improves quality and patient care. This involves clear processes, employee training, and a non-punitive reporting system focused on prevention and continuous improvement.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Patient Safety
  • Process Management

Background:

  • Error management is crucial for enhancing facility processes and patient care.
  • A strong organizational foundation, including management attitude and clear procedures, is essential.
  • Quality monitoring relies on defined processes, activities, and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline a comprehensive error management strategy for facility process improvement.
  • To emphasize the importance of a non-punitive approach to error reporting and analysis.
  • To highlight the role of error management in achieving better patient care outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Establishing a clear organizational foundation with supportive management.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implementing clearly defined processes, activities, and SOPs for operations and quality monitoring.
  • Training personnel in operational duties and error management, including the use of simulated errors.
  • Defining reportable errors, including those with potential harm and upstream errors.
  • Investigating underlying causes and implementing corrective actions, prioritizing prevention.
  • Utilizing functional and quality system-based error classification methods.
  • Actively searching for problems to uncover them before they impact outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Improved quality and patient care through error detection and reduction.
    • Enhanced employee confidence and reduced fear of reporting errors.
    • Successful identification and analysis of both direct and upstream errors.
    • Implementation of preventative corrective actions leading to process improvements.

    Conclusions:

    • A robust error management program is vital for continuous quality assurance and process improvement.
    • A culture that views errors as learning opportunities, not punishments, is key.
    • The ultimate reward of effective error management is demonstrably better patient care.