Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adhesive pre-coated brackets, a comparative clinical study

S Ash1, N Hay

  • 1Orthodontic Department, Whipps Cross Hospital, Forest Health Care NHS Trust, Leytonstone, London, U.K.

British Journal of Orthodontics
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Motor, cognitive, affective, and communication outcomes in patients with sustained remission of opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome.

European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society·2025
Same author

Contemporary outcomes of left thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy due to cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, a multicenter cohort study.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2024
Same author

Open left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy a viable option in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2022
Same author

Central nervous system relapse in high-risk stage 4 neuroblastoma: The HR-NBL1/SIOPEN trial experience.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2020
Same author

Impact on postoperative complications of changes in skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastro-oesophageal cancer.

BJS open·2020
Same author

International standards for fetal brain structures based on serial ultrasound measurements from Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> Project.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2020
Same journal

The bedfordshire PDS orthodontic pilot.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Reviews and abstracts

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Re: Forestadent travel award.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Re: Orthologic 'A' company award for 1997.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Digital cameras.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Cortical bone screws for maxillomandibular fixation in orthognathic surgery.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
See all related articles

The study compared adhesive pre-coated brackets with conventional no-mix adhesives for orthodontic bracket placement. Adhesive pre-coated brackets significantly reduced bracket failures and improved flash scores, offering advantages over traditional methods.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Dental Materials Science

Background:

  • Conventional orthodontic bracket placement relies on manual adhesive application.
  • Variability in adhesive handling can impact clinical efficiency and outcomes.
  • Adhesive pre-coated brackets offer a potential improvement in bracket placement procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical efficiency and effectiveness of an adhesive pre-coated bracket system with a conventional no-mix adhesive system.
  • To evaluate bracket placement time, reliability, and failure rates.
  • To assess the peri-bracket flash distribution and cleanup time.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective randomized study involving 38 orthodontic patients.
  • Patients were allocated to either adhesive pre-coated brackets or a no-mix adhesive system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Clinical stages of bracket placement, bracket identification/orientation time, peri-bracket flash, cleanup time, and bracket failures were recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • Placement and curing time for adhesive pre-coated brackets were not significantly different from the no-mix system.
    • The adhesive pre-coated group showed statistically significant reductions in bracket failure rates and peri-bracket flash scores.
    • Time savings in bracket orientation and subsequent cleanup compensated for any initial placement time differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Adhesive pre-coated bracket systems demonstrate significant advantages in reducing bracket failures and improving bond integrity.
    • These systems offer comparable or improved clinical efficiency and outcomes compared to conventional no-mix adhesives.
    • Adhesive pre-coated brackets represent a valuable advancement in orthodontic bracket placement technology.