Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: a comparative histologic study in humans

M Simion1, A Scarano, L Gionso

  • 1Department of Dentistry, University of Milan, San Raffaele Hospital, Italy.

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oral-Gut-Estrobolome Axis May Exert a Selective Impact on Oral Cancer.

Journal of dental research·2024
Same author

The experience of the rigid lockdown in the dental emergency room and urgency care during COVID-19 pandemic: a transnational multicenter observational study.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2024
Same author

Ceramic biomaterials in dentistry: chemical structure and biosafety - a review and a bibliometric visual mapping on Scopus database.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2024
Same author

Orofacial-Myofunctional therapy after lingual frenectomy in patient with tongue-tie: a systemic postural approach with mezieres method and postural bench.

European journal of paediatric dentistry·2023
Same author

Reduction of double chin without surgery using ascorbic acid and ascorbyl-palmitate solution: a clinical study.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2023
Same author

Use of electrical field for biofilm implant removal.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2023

Comparing resorbable poly(lactic acid)/poly(glycolic acid) membranes to nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes for dental implant defects, e-PTFE showed superior bone regeneration. Resorbable membranes offered some benefit over no treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Implantology
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Dental implant placement in postextraction sockets presents challenges for bone regeneration.
  • Barrier membranes are used in guided bone regeneration around dental implants.
  • Comparing resorbable and nonresorbable membranes is crucial for optimizing outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of resorbable poly(lactic acid)/poly(glycolic acid) (PLA/PGA) membranes versus nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membranes.
  • To evaluate bone regeneration in defects around titanium dental implants placed in postextraction sockets.
  • To assess the influence of different barrier materials on tissue regeneration.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving patients with partially and completely edentulous arches requiring dental implants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Sixteen Brånemark implants were placed in extraction sockets.
  • Defects were treated with PLA/PGA membranes (n=7), e-PTFE membranes (n=5), or left untreated (control, n=4).
  • Tissue biopsies were obtained after 6 months for light microscopy analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Control sites showed minimal to no bone formation.
    • e-PTFE membranes demonstrated the highest effectiveness, promoting denser and greater amounts of regenerated bone.
    • PLA/PGA membranes facilitated some bone regeneration compared to controls, but less than e-PTFE.

    Conclusions:

    • Nonresorbable e-PTFE membranes are more effective than resorbable PLA/PGA membranes for guided bone regeneration around dental implants in extraction sockets.
    • Resorbable PLA/PGA membranes offer a moderate benefit over no membrane treatment.
    • Material choice significantly impacts the extent of bone regeneration in implant dentistry.