Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reasoning strategies for suppositional deductions

R M Byrne1, S J Handley

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Ireland. rmbyrne@tcd.ie

Cognition
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Necessity, possibility and belief: a study of syllogistic reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2001
Same author

The suppression of q card selections: evidence for deductive inference in Wason's selection task.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2000
Same author

Counterfactual thinking about controllable events.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same author

Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.

Cognition·2000
Same author

Counterfactual thinking about actions and failures to act.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

The temporality effect in counterfactual thinking about what might have been.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study explores deductive reasoning strategies in solving logic puzzles. Findings show that people develop and improve reasoning skills spontaneously, highlighting the role of strategy development in thinking.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Logic and Reasoning

Background:

  • Deductive reasoning relies on control strategies for complex problem-solving.
  • Suppositional deduction puzzles involve truth-tellers and liars, posing unique challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the nature and development of control strategies in suppositional deduction.
  • To understand how individuals approach and improve their reasoning in logic puzzles.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using suppositional deduction puzzles.
  • Participants' reasoning processes, including forward and backward inferences and supposition generation, were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Reasoners employ both forward and backward inferences, with supposition generation being a difficulty.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Eliminating an individual's suppositional status did not simplify the problems.
  • Reasoners improved accuracy and speed spontaneously, indicating strategy development and transfer.

    • Conclusions:

    • Strategy development is crucial for improving deductive reasoning performance.
    • Findings inform theories of suppositional deduction and the relationship between reasoning and problem-solving.