Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nonsampling measurement error in administrative data: implications for economic evaluations

N Wolff1, T W Helminiak

  • 1Department of Urban Studies and Community Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.

Health Economics
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real-time monitoring of CdTe quantum dots growth in aqueous solution.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Prospective multicentre observational study assessing the tolerance and perception of patients using the Liquick Base catheter with an Ergothan tip.

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2020
Same author

Synchrotron FTIR and Raman spectroscopy provide unique spectral fingerprints for Arabidopsis floral stem vascular tissues.

Journal of experimental botany·2018
Same author

Diagnostic accuracy of the ADOS and ADOS-2 in clinical practice.

European child & adolescent psychiatry·2018
Same author

Functional NiTi grids for in situ straining in the TEM.

Ultramicroscopy·2017
Same author

Effects of multisensory integration processes on response inhibition in adolescent autism spectrum disorder.

Psychological medicine·2016

Measurement errors in administrative data can skew economic evaluations. This study found data quality varies by agency ownership and financial incentives, impacting cost estimates and treatment effect validity. Solutions are proposed.

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Health services research
  • Data quality assessment

Background:

  • Administrative databases are crucial for measuring resource use in economic evaluations.
  • Traditional assumptions posit measurement error is random and uncorrelated with group assignment.
  • Systematic errors can confound treatment effects with data quality issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of nonsampling measurement error on the validity of cost estimates derived from administrative records.
  • To examine how service delivery characteristics, such as ownership and financial incentives, influence data quality.
  • To propose methods for detecting and managing data quality variations in administrative datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of administrative data from three community mental health centers across different states.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of data quality based on agency ownership (public vs. private) and financial incentives (reimbursement property rights).
  • Development of tests to detect variations in service use and cost data.
  • Main Results:

    • Evidence of systematic differences in data quality was found, influenced by ownership and financial incentives.
    • Private agencies with reimbursement property rights demonstrated higher data quality compared to public agencies without these rights.
    • The study identified potential biases in cost estimates due to measurement error correlated with service delivery characteristics.

    Conclusions:

    • Nonsampling measurement error in administrative data can compromise the internal and external validity of economic evaluations.
    • Agency characteristics, particularly ownership and financial incentives, significantly affect data quality.
    • Simple tests and cost-effective solutions are needed to manage data quality issues in administrative datasets for reliable economic evaluations.