Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The European convention on bioethics

M A de Wachter

    The Hastings Center Report
    |January 1, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary

    The Council of Europe

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    How useful is Leuven personalism in the world of bioethics? The test case of artificial insemination.

    European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·1999
    Same author

    [Not Available].

    KOS·1997
    Same author

    Euthanasia in The Netherlands.

    The Hastings Center report·1992
    Same author

    The Dutch & the dying.

    The Hastings Center report·1991
    Same author

    Active euthanasia in The Netherlands.

    JAMA·1989
    Same author

    Interdisciplinary bioethics: but where do we start? A reflection of epochè as method.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·1982

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • European Law
    • Biomedical Research Regulation

    Background:

    • Harmonizing European bioethics regulations has been a goal for nearly 15 years.
    • Disparate national laws create challenges in cross-border biomedical research and practice.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the development and implications of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.
    • To highlight the significance of establishing a binding international legal framework for bioethics in Europe.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of the drafting process and key provisions of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.
    • Analysis of the debates surrounding the convention, particularly concerning research on vulnerable populations.

    Main Results:

    • The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine was approved for adoption in November 1996.
    • The draft convention sparked significant debate, especially on informed consent in research.

    Conclusions:

    • The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine represents a landmark effort to create a unified European bioethics standard.
    • Its ratification will establish the first legally binding international instrument on human rights and biomedicine in the region.
    Keywords:
    Bioethics and Professional EthicsBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchCouncil of EuropeEuropean Convention on Human Rights and BiomedicineLegal Approach

    Related Experiment Videos