Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Mechanical digestive system suturing devices]

A Popovici1, I Popescu, M I Ionescu

  • 1Clinica de chirurgie generală, Spitalul Clinic Fundeni, Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Carol Davila, Bucureşti.

Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)
|May 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental investigation of D<sub>2</sub> conversion to DHO in soil near the Cernavoda nuclear power plant site in Romania.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2020
Same author

Hepatocellular carcinoma tumour burden score to stratify prognosis after resection.

The British journal of surgery·2020
Same author

Updates in CT characterization of thymic epithelial tumors in patients with myasthenia gravis.

Journal of medicine and life·2019
Same author

Amphiphilic polysaccharide based on curdlan: Synthesis and behaviour in aqueous solution.

Carbohydrate polymers·2019
Same author

THE ROLE OF SURGERY IN A PATIENT WITH CARCINOID SYNDROME, COMPLICATED BY CARCINOID HEART DISEASE.

Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)·2019
Same author

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH SURGICAL RESECTION OF PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOURS.

Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)·2019
Same journal

From Scope to Scalpel: A Review of the Timing and Outcomes of Conversion in Minimally Invasive Liver Resections.

Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2026
Same journal

Pediatric Penetrating Foot Injury Complicated by Soft-Tissue Infection.

Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2026
Same journal

Laparoscopic Removal of a Gastric Trichobezoar in Adulthood: A Case Report.

Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2026
Same journal

Metabolomic Profiling of Plasma Bile Acids in Resectable Gastric Cancer.

Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2026
Same journal

Laparoscopic Surgery: Patient Benefits and Surgeon Challenges. A Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2026
Same journal

Erratum to Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy - Initial Experience in a Hepatopancreatobiliary High-Volume Center.

Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2026
See all related articles

Surgical stapling devices, including Gastrointestinal Anastomosis (GIA), TA, and end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) staplers, offer significant advantages in digestive surgery. These devices reduce operation time, blood loss, and complications, leading to faster patient recovery.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Technology
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Surgical stapling devices have become integral to modern digestive surgery.
  • Evaluating the efficacy and safety of various stapling devices is crucial for surgical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the outcomes of using ETHICON stapling devices (GIA, TA, EEA) in 150 patients undergoing digestive resections and reconstructions.
  • To identify the advantages and complications associated with surgical stapler use.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 150 patients operated on between December 1994 and May 1996.
  • Utilized Linear Cutter (GIA), Linear Stapler (TA), and Intraluminal Circular Stapler (EEA) devices for various digestive surgeries.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stapler use reduced operation time, anesthesia duration, and blood loss.
  • Reported advantages include softer tissue handling, reduced inflammation, and prevention of contamination.
  • Low complication rates: 4 intraoperative hemorrhages, 3 postoperative hemorrhages, 1 immediate leakage, and 7 precocious leaks; only 5 patients required corrective surgery.
  • One operative death due to broncho-pneumonia post-esophagectomy, unrelated to stapler application.

Conclusions:

  • Surgical stapling devices represent significant progress in digestive surgery when used with correct indications and techniques.
  • The economic investment in staplers is justified by the substantial patient benefits, including faster functional recovery.
  • While short-term results are promising, longer follow-up is needed to assess late complications like anastomosis stenosis.