Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Basic science of spinal instrumentation

V K Goel1, L G Gilbertson

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering and Orthopaedics, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|February 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION IN GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS L. IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, AMERICA.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: predictive power of models improves when combined together.

Journal of biomechanics·2014
Same author

Pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilisation of the lumbar spine: in vitro cadaver investigation and a finite element study.

Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering·2014
Same author

Effect of the Coonrad elbow prosthesis on stresses in the humerus.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Effects of injury on the spinal motion segment mechanics in the axial compression mode.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilization systems.

Advances in orthopedics·2013
Same journal

Impact Microindentation Evaluates Bone Strength, Bone Quality, and Fracture Susceptibility Across Skeletal Sites: A Cadaver Study.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

What Is the Effect of Robot Reduction in Displaced Pelvic Fractures? A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

CORR Insights®: Acute or Delayed TKA for Tibial Plateau Fracture? An Observational Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Guest Editorial: Recalling a Recall.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Radial Head Fractures Cluster in the Anterolateral and Anteromedial Quadrants and Do Not Correlate With Coronoid Fracture Types.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reduced Cerebellar Activation With Eyes Closed Is Associated With Delayed Peroneal Reaction Time in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
See all related articles

Spinal implants aid fusion or offer alternatives like artificial discs. Biomechanics research improves implant design and understanding, but further clinical trials are needed for optimal spinal disorder treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Spinal Surgery

Background:

  • Spinal implants are crucial for treating spinal disorders, with most promoting fusion.
  • Newer devices like artificial discs aim to mitigate fusion's drawbacks.
  • Biomechanics significantly influences spinal implant design and clinical use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail biomechanics' contributions to spinal implant design and clinical application.
  • To review methods for evaluating spinal implant performance and biological integration.
  • To highlight areas for improvement in spinal fusion and alternatives.

Main Methods:

  • Benchtop testing of implant components and assemblies.
  • In vitro studies using spinal segments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analytical models (e.g., finite element analysis) and animal studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Quantification of stresses and strains provides insight into clinical outcomes.
    • Improved fusion techniques have reduced pseudarthrosis rates.
    • Understanding the link between mechanical factors and clinical observations.

    Conclusions:

    • Biomechanics enhances spinal implant design and clinical understanding.
    • Despite progress, further improvements in spinal fusion are necessary.
    • Biological enhancement and artificial disc alternatives require extensive clinical validation.