Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Setting standards for radiation protection: the process appraised

|March 1, 1997

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Are all ecological studies fallacious? Not necessarily.

Health physics·1997

Same author

Case-control study of malignant melanoma among employees of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

American journal of industrial medicine·1997

Same author

Measurement of induced activity to estimate personnel radiation exposures received from accelerator beams.

Health physics·1972

Same author

"What quality factor"?

Health physics·1971

Same author

Whole-body counting and bioassay determinations made on accelerator workers.

Health physics·1969

Same author

Natural and fallout radioactivity in the San Francisco Bay area.

Health physics·1969

Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026

Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026

Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026

Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026

Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026

Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026

See all related articles

Current radiation protection standards rely heavily on the linear non-threshold model, but evidence suggests this model is flawed. A re-evaluation of radiation safety standards is needed due to data and theoretical inconsistencies.

Area of Science:

Radiation protection standards
Radiobiology
Risk assessment

Background:

Current radiation protection standards are largely based on the linear non-threshold (LNT) model.
The LNT model assumes radiation effects increase linearly with dose, with no safe threshold.
This model's dominance in standard setting is questioned by existing data and theory.

Purpose of the Study:

To review literature critically evaluating the linear non-threshold model.
To identify data and theoretical arguments that contradict the LNT model.
To highlight the need for a revised approach in radiation protection standard setting.

Main Methods:

Comprehensive literature review of radiation protection data and theory.
Analysis of studies cited and not cited by standard-setting bodies.

Related Experiment Videos

Examination of data adaptation and reasoning within the standard-setting process.

Main Results:

Significant body of literature and theoretical work challenges the LNT model.
Established standard-setting bodies have overlooked or ignored contradictory evidence.
Evidence of data adaptation and circular reasoning in the current standard-setting framework.

Conclusions:

The linear non-threshold model's universal application in radiation protection is scientifically questionable.
A critical reassessment of radiation protection standards is urgently required.
A new, evidence-based approach is necessary for setting radiation safety standards.