Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Competition-based head versus foot decision in chimeric hydras

W A Müller1

  • 1Zoological Institute, University of Heidelberg, Germany. W.MULLER@SIRIUS.MGEN.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

The International Journal of Developmental Biology
|December 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

North Atlantic climate far more predictable than models imply.

Nature·2020
Same author

Predicting the variable ocean carbon sink.

Science advances·2019
Same author

The effects of sulphydryl reagents on morphogenesis in hydroids : I. Metamorphosis and regeneration inHydractinia echinata.

Wilhelm Roux' Archiv fur Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen·2017
Same author

Regeneration in Hydrozoa: distal versus proximal transformation in Hydractinia.

Roux's archives of developmental biology : the official organ of the EDBO·2017
Same author

Abnormal alpha cell function in diabetics response to insulin.

Diabetes·2014
Same author

Getting leukocytes to the site of inflammation.

Veterinary pathology·2013

In Hydra regeneration, competition for resources determines head or foot formation. A low-capacity strain (reg-16) fails to recruit essential resources, leading to foot formation when competing with a high-capacity strain (wt105).

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Regenerative Biology
  • Animal Physiology

Background:

  • Hydra regeneration is influenced by resource competition, including precursor cells and hormones.
  • The outcome (head vs. foot formation) depends on which end of the body column wins this competition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide experimental evidence supporting the resource competition hypothesis in Hydra regeneration.
  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of differential head regeneration capacity in Hydra magnipapillata strains.

Main Methods:

  • Construction of chimeras using two Hydra magnipapillata strains with differing head regeneration capacities (reg-16 and wt105).
  • Comparative analysis of tissue interactions and resource recruitment in competing chimeric fragments.
  • Use of labeled donor animals in triplet chimera experiments to track cell incorporation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The reg-16 strain exhibits a reduced ability to recruit head-promoting resources, explaining its low regeneration capacity.
  • When competing with wt105 tissue, reg-16 tissue preferentially forms feet, while wt105 forms enlarged heads.
  • Head-forming wt105 tissue demonstrates more effective incorporation of migrating cells compared to head-forming reg-16 tissue.

Conclusions:

  • The study experimentally supports the resource competition model for head versus foot determination in Hydra regeneration.
  • Differential recruitment of head-promoting resources is a key factor in the varying regeneration capacities of Hydra strains.
  • Cellular incorporation dynamics differ between high and low head-regenerating tissues, highlighting the importance of cell migration.