Related Experiment Videos
Total clinical laboratory test volume in Connecticut, 1994-1995
1Yale Medical School, New Haven, USA.
Connecticut Medicine
|January 1, 1997
Summary
Connecticut clinical laboratories performed over 65 million tests in 1995, averaging 20 tests per person. This study provides a baseline for clinical laboratory test volumes and identifies areas for data improvement.
Area of Science:
- Medical Laboratory Science
- Health Services Research
- Public Health Data Analysis
Background:
- Understanding the volume and distribution of clinical laboratory testing is crucial for healthcare resource allocation and public health surveillance.
- Previous data on clinical laboratory test volumes have been fragmented, making comprehensive analysis challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the total volume of clinical laboratory testing conducted in Connecticut over a one-year period.
- To analyze the distribution of testing by facility type and technology category.
- To explore the potential value and applications of a comprehensive clinical laboratory data bank.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of federal and state clinical laboratory registration, licensure, and inspection forms.
- Data compilation from 2,333 registered clinical laboratory test facilities in Connecticut.
- Segregation of test volumes by facility type (hospitals, commercial labs, physician offices) and technology category (chemistry, hematology, microbiology, etc.).
Main Results:
- In 1995, 2,333 facilities performed approximately 65.4 million clinical laboratory analyses in Connecticut, equating to about 20 tests per person annually.
- Acute care hospitals accounted for the largest share of testing (59.4%), followed by large commercial laboratories (33.2%).
- Chemistry (59%) and hematology (23.3%) represented the dominant technology categories for laboratory tests performed.
Conclusions:
- The study established a mechanism for measuring nearly all clinical testing within a defined geographic area.
- The data collection system, while functional, has potential for significant improvement with minor modifications.
- The findings highlight the utility of a centralized data bank for understanding clinical laboratory utilization and informing healthcare policy.