Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative sensory testing

D Yarnitsky1

  • 1Department of Neurology, Rambam Medical Center and Technion Medical School Haifa, Israel.

Muscle & Nerve
|February 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) assesses nerve fiber function. This review examines QST algorithms for optimizing results and discusses quality control and clinical applications in neurophysiology.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preoperative preemptive drug administration for acute postoperative pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2016
Same author

A novel electroencephalography-based tool for objective assessment of network dynamics activated by nociceptive stimuli.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2015
Same author

'Virtual lesion' in pain research; a study on magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2015
Same author

Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2014
Same author

Atypical central pain processing in sensory modulation disorder: absence of temporal summation and higher after-sensation.

Experimental brain research·2013
Same author

Associations between autonomic dysfunction and pain in chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2013
Same journal

Fat-Fraction Quantification Using Three-Point Dixon Technique in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Its Correlation With Clinical Progression and Genotypic Characteristics: A Single Centre One-Year Prospective Study.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Characterizing Combined Central and Peripheral Demyelination-Insights From a Multimodal Comparison With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy and Multiple Sclerosis.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Electrical Modalities in the Rehabilitation of Peripheral Nerve Injuries: State of the Literature and Current Clinical Applications.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Reply to "Sural/Radial Amplitude Ratio in Non-Length-Dependent Neuropathy (NLDN): A Call for More Standardized Methodology and Further Evaluation of Distal NLDN".

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Late-Onset Myasthenia Gravis: An Increasingly Frequent Clinical Entity With Distinctive Challenges.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same journal

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Management of Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Muscle & nerve·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Sensory Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is widely used in clinical neurophysiology.
  • QST measures thermal and vibratory senses to assess small and large sensory nerve fiber function, respectively.
  • Sensory thresholds are psychophysical parameters requiring optimized testing algorithms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare various test algorithms used in QST.
  • To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different QST algorithms.
  • To cover quality control considerations and clinical applications of QST.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic screening of existing QST test algorithms.
  • Comparative analysis of algorithm performance, advantages, and disadvantages.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of quality control measures and clinical use cases.

    • Main Results:

    • Identification of various QST algorithms with distinct characteristics.
    • Discussion of the trade-offs between different algorithms for optimizing sensory threshold measurements.
    • Overview of quality control strategies and current clinical applications.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of QST algorithm impacts the reliability and validity of sensory function assessment.
    • Standardized quality control is crucial for accurate QST results.
    • QST is a valuable tool for diagnosing and monitoring neurological conditions affecting sensory pathways.