Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for performed tasks

J Engelkamp1

  • 1University of the Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany. engelkamp@rz.uni-sb.de

Memory & Cognition
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Episodic recall with special reference to German contributions].

Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie·2001
Same author

Pop-out into memory: a retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

[Selective interference, process dissociation and serial information in recall of performed actions. A comment on Thorsten Meiser's remarks on the multimodal memory theory].

Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie·2000
Same author

Levels-of-processing effects in subject-performed tasks.

Memory & cognition·1999
Same author

Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.

Memory (Hove, England)·1998

Memory for actions you perform is better than just hearing about them. This memory benefit depends on experimental design, with actual performance at study offering the most robust recall.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory Research

Background:

  • Memory for subject-performed tasks generally exceeds memory for verbal tasks.
  • Prior research presents conflicting findings on whether the intention to perform a task enhances memory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the intention to perform a task enhances memory compared to verbal tasks.
  • To reconcile discrepancies in previous findings regarding task performance and memory recall.
  • To determine the influence of experimental design (within-subjects vs. between-subjects) on memory performance.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted comparing subject-performed tasks, to-be-performed tasks, and verbal tasks.
  • The study utilized both within-subjects and between-subjects designs.
  • Recall performance was assessed under congruent and incongruent test conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • In a between-subjects design, memory for subject-performed tasks was superior to to-be-performed tasks, which in turn surpassed verbal tasks.
  • In a within-subjects design, memory for to-be-performed tasks did not differ from verbal tasks.
  • These findings were consistent regardless of test mode congruence.

Conclusions:

  • The discrepancy in prior research appears attributable to the experimental design employed.
  • Encoding processes, particularly actual action performance during study, are critical for enhanced memory.
  • Actual performance of actions at study provides richer memory encoding than mere intention to perform.