Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do pulse checks cause a significant delay in the initial defibrillation sequence?

J E Gough1, M K Kerr, R A Henderson

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Greenville, NC 27858-4354, USA.

Resuscitation
|February 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward the Discovery of New Elements: Production of Livermorium (Z=116) with ^{50}Ti.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

3D bioprinting of an intervertebral disc tissue analogue with a highly aligned annulus fibrosus via suspended layer additive manufacture.

Biofabrication·2024
Same author

Elevated fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, and Factor VIII confer resistance to dilutional coagulopathy and activated protein C in normal pregnant women.

British journal of anaesthesia·2019
Same author

The Canadian National EMS Research Agenda: Impact and Feasibility of Implementation of Previously Generated Recommendations.

CJEM·2015
Same author

Modified statistical dynamical diffraction theory: analysis of model SiGe heterostructures.

Journal of applied crystallography·2013
Same author

Synthesis and characterization of a hybrid (chitosan-g-glycidyl methacrylate)-xanthan hydrogel.

Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition·2013
Same journal

Pre-hospital neurological risk stratification at return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - the Pre-MIRACLE<sub>2</sub> score.

Resuscitation·2026
Same journal

Beyond Creatinine: Kidney Biomarkers as Windows into Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury After Cardiac Arrest.

Resuscitation·2026
Same journal

Optimal Site of Tactile Stimulation during Initial Steps of Neonatal Resuscitation: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Resuscitation·2026
Same journal

Resolving uncertainties in patient selection for mechanical circulatory support after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Resuscitation·2026
Same journal

Association of Rescue Breathing With Outcomes in Adult Suffocation-Related Cardiac Arrest.

Resuscitation·2026
Same journal

Sex-specific effects of manual pressure augmentation during defibrillation: a mechanistic hypothesis.

Resuscitation·2026
See all related articles

Checking for a pulse during defibrillation causes a slight delay, but it is not clinically significant. This finding is important for emergency medical protocols.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Practice

Background:

  • Defibrillation is a critical intervention for cardiac arrest.
  • The timing of defibrillation administration is crucial for patient outcomes.
  • Current guidelines do not uniformly specify pulse-checking procedures between defibrillation attempts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of pulse checks on defibrillation timing.
  • To determine if pulse-checking delays are clinically significant.

Main Methods:

  • Ten emergency department nurses and 10 resident physicians participated.
  • Participants performed three successive defibrillations on a manikin under three conditions: no pulse check, assistant pulse check, and participant pulse check.
  • Defibrillation energy levels ranged from 200 to 360 Joules (J).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three different defibrillator models were used.
  • Repeated measures analysis of variance analyzed the time differences.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean defibrillation time without pulse checks was 20.4 ± 1.0 s.
    • Mean time with assistant pulse checks was 20.2 ± 1.2 s.
    • Mean time with participant pulse checks was 22.0 ± 2.0 s.
    • A statistically significant delay occurred when participants performed pulse checks.
    • No significant delay was observed when an assistant performed pulse checks.

    Conclusions:

    • Pulse checks by the participant introduce a statistically significant delay in defibrillation.
    • This delay is unlikely to be clinically relevant in emergency settings.
    • The findings suggest that current practices regarding pulse checks may need re-evaluation.