Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial attention does not require preattentive grouping

S P Vecera1, M Behrmann

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112, USA. Shaun.Vecera@m.cc.utah.edu

Neuropsychology
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal lobe contribution to perceptual function: A tale of three patient groups.

Neuropsychologia·2016
Same author

Cortical differentiation and neurocognitive development: The parcellation conjecture.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

On the interaction of selective attention and lexical knowledge: a connectionist account of neglect dyslexia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

The development of inhibition of return in early infancy.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Development of spontaneous alternation in infancy.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same journal

The association between daily real-time assessment of subjective cognitive function and objective cognition using ecological momentary assessment.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Obtaining comparable measurement of midlife cognitive functioning from disparate cognitive tasks.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Cognitive impairments associated with meningiomas and gliomas in adults: A systematic review.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Neuropsychological assessment in low-resource versus high-resource contexts: A reply to comments on Stiers (2026).

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Testing is important: A truism worth remembering.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Of dogs and diagnoses: Does clinical reasoning still matter in an age of biomarkers, functional imaging, and artificial intelligence?

Neuropsychology·2026
See all related articles

Spatial attention can select ungrouped visual regions, independent of preattentive grouping. Patient J.W. demonstrated intact spatial attention but impaired grouping, suggesting these processes are distinct yet interact.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Investigating the relationship between preattentive processing and spatial attention is crucial for understanding visual perception.
  • Previous theories proposed that spatial attention relies on a full preattentive analysis of the visual field.

Observation:

  • Apperceptive agnosic patient J.W. exhibited normal spatial attention, evidenced by faster target detection at cued locations.
  • J.W. displayed significant deficits in preattentive processes, including Gestalt grouping and symmetry perception.

Findings:

  • Spatial attention can operate independently of preattentive grouping mechanisms.
  • Impaired preattentive grouping did not hinder J.W.'s ability to utilize spatial cues for attention.
  • These findings challenge the notion that spatial attention is entirely dependent on preattentive analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Implications:

  • Spatial attention and preattentive grouping are distinct but interact to guide visual selection.
  • Understanding this dissociation offers new insights into the modularity of visual processing.
  • Further research can explore the precise nature of the mutual constraints between these two systems.