Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risk assessment

R W Brecher1

  • 1GlobalTox International Consultants Inc., Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Toxicologic Pathology
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Risk assessment evaluates potential harm from environmental hazards. Integrating mechanistic data improves accuracy in determining real risks versus perceived risks from toxicant exposures.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Grouping of PFAS for human health risk assessment: Findings from an independent panel of experts.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2022
Same author

Development of a dermal cancer slope factor for benzo[a]pyrene.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2006
Same author

Response letter from ACSH phthalate panel.

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2000
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Toxicology
  • Risk Analysis

Background:

  • Risk assessment identifies adverse effects from chemical, biological, or physical hazards.
  • It informs regulations for minimizing health impacts from long-term, low-level toxicant exposure.
  • Applications include pharmaceutical safety, occupational health, and evaluating past exposures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of risk assessment, including its strengths and weaknesses.
  • To explore the difference between real and perceived risks.
  • To discuss enhancing risk assessment through pathologist and assessor collaboration.

Main Methods:

  • Review of toxicological data, primarily from in vivo animal studies.
  • Extrapolation of dose-response data across species and exposure levels.
  • Analysis of mechanistic information's role in risk perception.

Main Results:

  • Current methods rely heavily on animal data, involving significant extrapolation and uncertainty.
  • The availability and integration of mechanistic data influence the distinction between real and perceived risks.
  • Collaboration between pathologists and risk assessors can strengthen risk assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Risk assessment is a crucial tool for managing environmental health risks.
  • Improving risk assessment requires better integration of mechanistic data.
  • Enhanced collaboration can lead to more defensible health evaluations for chronic exposures.

Related Experiment Videos