Pitch and loudness estimation for single and multiple pulse per period electric pulse rates by cochlear implant
1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract:
Numerical estimates of loudness and pitch for electric pulse rates were obtained from 14 patients using the 22 electrode cochlear implant manufactured by Cochlear Limited. Six patients were postlinguistically deafened adults, and eight patients were adults and children who became deaf very early in life. Comparisons were made between two types of pulse rate patterns. The SPP pulse pattern presented a single pulse every period, the inverse of the pulse rate. The MPP pulse pattern presented multiple pulses in the first half of the period, using a rate of 1000 pulses/s, with no stimulation in the second half of the period. The pulse rates used for the SPP and MPP pulse patterns were 71.4-500 pulses/s, which corresponded to periods of 14-2 ms. For the SPP pulse pattern, the total number of pulses over the duration of the stimulus increased with increases in pulse rate, while for the MPP pulse pattern, the total number of pulses remained constant. Pitch and loudness estimates were obtained from the postlinguistically deafened patients for the SPP and MPP pulse patterns, and from the early-deafened patients for the MPP pulse pattern. Loudness estimates for the SPP pulse pattern increased with increases in pulse rate for all postlinguistically deafened patients. Loudness estimates for the MPP pulse pattern decreased with increases in pulse rate for three of the six postlinguistically deafened patients and for six of the eight early-deafened patients. For the other patients (three postlinguistically deafened and two early-deafened), loudness estimates marginally increased with increases in pulse rate. Pitch estimates for the SPP and MPP pulse patterns increased with increases in pulse rate for the six postlinguistically deafened patients. For the early-deafened patients, pitch estimates for the MPP pulse patterns increased with increases in pulse rate for only five of the eight patients. For the other three early-deafened patients, pitch estimates were similar to the loudness estimates and decreased with increases in pulse rate.
