Related Experiment Videos

Supralingual temperatures compared to tympanic and rectal temperatures

R L Beckstrand1, R Wilshaw, S Moran

  • 1Brigham Young University College of Nursing in Provo, UT, USA. renea_beckstrand@byu.edu

Pediatric Nursing
|September 1, 1996
PubMed

Insights

The Paci-Temp digital pacifier thermometer shows similar temperature readings to ear thermometers when compared to rectal measurements. Further research is needed for at-home thermometers.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Medical Devices
  • Thermometry

Background:

  • Accurate temperature measurement in infants is crucial for timely diagnosis and treatment.
  • Existing non-invasive thermometers have varying degrees of accuracy.
  • The Paci-Temp digital pacifier thermometer offers a novel approach to infant temperature monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the Paci-Temp supralingual digital pacifier thermometer.
  • To compare Paci-Temp readings against established tympanic (Thermoscan Instant) and rectal (glass-mercury) thermometers.

Main Methods:

  • Eighty-one children under 2 years old participated in the study.
  • Temperatures were sequentially measured at supralingual, tympanic, and rectal sites.
  • Agreement percentages were calculated to determine sensitivity and specificity, with corrections applied between readings.

Main Results:

  • Compared to rectal glass-mercury thermometers, both supralingual (Paci-Temp) and tympanic measurements exhibited a specificity of 62.8% and sensitivity of 63.3%.
  • Correlation coefficients were 0.62 between rectal and supralingual readings, and 0.71 between rectal and tympanic readings.

Conclusions:

  • The Paci-Temp digital pacifier thermometer demonstrates comparable temperature readings to the tympanic method when contrasted with the rectal method.
  • Further investigation into the performance and reliability of at-home thermometers is warranted.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos