Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical guidelines for management

D L Scott1

  • 1King's College Hospital, Dulwich, London, UK.

Bailliere'S Clinical Rheumatology
|February 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Clinical practice guidelines offer evidence-based recommendations for rheumatology care. However, significant variations in clinical practice suggest guidelines may have limited utility in influencing physician decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multi-biomarker disease activity score can predict sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis.

Arthritis research & therapy·2020
Same author

Secular changes in functional disability, pain, fatigue and mental well-being in early rheumatoid arthritis. A longitudinal meta-analysis.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2019
Same author

The frequency of remission and low disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and their ability to identify people with low disability and normal quality of life.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2019
Same author

Impact of intensive treatment and remission on health-related quality of life in early and established rheumatoid arthritis.

RMD open·2016
Same author

Improving medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis (RA): a pilot study.

Psychology, health & medicine·2015
Same author

Treat to target in managing inflammatory arthritis.

British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005)·2015
Same journal

Regional soft tissue pains: alias myofascial pain?

Bailliere's clinical rheumatology·1999
Same journal

The knee

Bailliere's clinical rheumatology·1999
Same journal

The elbow, forearm, wrist and hand

Bailliere's clinical rheumatology·1999
Same journal

Shoulder disorders: a state-of-the-art review

Bailliere's clinical rheumatology·1999
Same journal

The neck

Bailliere's clinical rheumatology·1999
Same journal

Treatment options for regional musculoskeletal pain: what is the evidence?

Bailliere's clinical rheumatology·1999
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Rheumatology
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Clinical guidelines provide formal recommendations for managing common health problems based on scientific evidence.
  • Significant variability exists in rheumatology practice, partly due to uncertainties in measuring disease outcomes.
  • Guidelines aim to standardize care, reduce ineffective treatments, and aid decision-making for practitioners and patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing North American and UK guidelines for rheumatological conditions.
  • To discuss the potential utility and limitations of clinical guidelines in influencing rheumatology practice.
  • To propose future research directions for improving the impact of guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Review and discussion of established and proposed clinical practice guidelines in rheumatology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of variations in clinical practice and decision-making processes.
  • Identification of areas for future research regarding guideline development and implementation.

    • Main Results:

    • North American and UK guidelines present broadly similar recommendations for rheumatological conditions.
    • Evidence indicates substantial discrepancies between actual clinical practice and guideline recommendations.
    • The direct impact of guidelines on clinical decision-making and practice may be limited.

    Conclusions:

    • While guidelines offer a framework for care, their ability to uniformly influence clinical practice is questionable.
    • Future efforts should focus on identifying outcome-related aspects of guidelines, clinician education, and practical implementation.
    • Regular updates and outcome-focused research are crucial for enhancing the utility of rheumatology guidelines.