Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motion deblurring in human vision

D C Burr1, M J Morgan

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Rome, Italy.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|March 22, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors limiting quantitative phase retrieval in atomic-resolution differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy using a segmented detector.

Ultramicroscopy·2022
Same author

Lagged recovery of fish spatial distributions following a cold-water perturbation.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Suppressing dynamical diffraction artefacts in differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy of long-range electromagnetic fields via precession.

Ultramicroscopy·2020
Same author

Spontaneous perception of numerosity in pre-school children.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2019
Same author

High contrast at low dose using a single, defocussed transmission electron micrograph.

Micron (Oxford, England : 1993)·2019
Same author

Robotic vs. laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception: a systematic review.

Techniques in coloproctology·2019
Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Moving objects appear sharp due to limitations in visual discrimination, not active blur suppression. This study found motion actually increased blur discrimination thresholds, suggesting subjective sharpness doesn't improve performance.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The human visual system typically perceives moving objects as sharp, despite the physical blur introduced by motion.
  • This apparent sharpness suggests a potential active mechanism for motion blur suppression, though its effect on discrimination is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether active motion blur suppression enhances visual discrimination performance.
  • To measure blur discrimination thresholds for moving objects under varying exposure durations.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a two-alternative forced-choice task, discriminating blur levels of moving Gaussian-blurred edges and bars.
  • Blur discrimination thresholds were measured for brief (40 ms) and longer (150 ms) exposures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study compared discrimination performance for stationary versus moving stimuli.

    • Main Results:

    • Motion significantly increased thresholds for blur discrimination, indicating reduced ability to discern blur differences.
    • This effect was observed for both brief and longer exposure durations.
    • The findings contradict the hypothesis of an active deblurring mechanism that enhances discrimination.

    Conclusions:

    • Motion deblurring is a subjective perceptual phenomenon that does not improve the visual system's ability to discriminate blur.
    • The apparent sharpness of moving objects arises from the visual system's inability to perform fine discriminations under motion conditions.
    • Active blur suppression mechanisms do not appear to enhance visual discrimination performance for moving stimuli.