Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Potential consequences and problems with wildlife contraceptives

V F Nettles1

  • 1College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.

Reproduction, Fertility, and Development
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Organization of wildlife disease services in the United States.

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2020
Same author

Large scale mortality of nestling ardeids caused by nematode infection.

Journal of wildlife diseases·2013
Same author

Cerebrospinal parelaphostrongylosis in fallow deer.

Journal of wildlife diseases·2013
Same author

Recommendations of a National Working Group on Prevention and Control of Rabies in the United States. Article III: Rabies in wildlife. National Working Group on Rabies Prevention and Control.

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2003
Same author

Health protocol for translocation of free-ranging elk.

Journal of wildlife diseases·2001
Same author

The effect of dietary aflatoxin on wild turkey poults.

Journal of wildlife diseases·2000
Same journal

Bifidobacterium longum BB536 supplementation is associated with increased circulating choline plasmalogen concentrations in non-pregnant, non-lactating dairy cows.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2026
Same journal

Interleukin 12 on extracellular matrix-related factors and functional characteristics of equine endometrial fibroblasts.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2026
Same journal

CRH expression and function in mouse uterus during early pregnancy.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to: Influence of neonatal estrogens on rat prostate development.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2026
Same journal

Cellular and molecular characterization of the testicular development of GDF9-edited pigs.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2026
Same journal

Comparative analysis of acidosis defense mechanisms in preimplantation embryos in BALB/c strain mice: in vivo vs in vitro development.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2026
See all related articles

Wildlife contraception presents numerous health risks to individual animals and populations, including adverse effects on reproduction, physiology, and behavior. Careful consideration of potential impacts is crucial for safe and effective wildlife management strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Medicine
  • Wildlife Ecology
  • Reproductive Biology

Background:

  • Contraception is increasingly used in wildlife management for population control.
  • Previous studies highlight various adverse effects of wildlife contraceptives on individual animals and populations.
  • Concerns exist regarding the long-term ecological and genetic impacts of certain contraceptive methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and synthesize the known health considerations associated with wildlife contraception.
  • To identify potential adverse effects on individual animals and wildlife populations.
  • To offer criteria for the safe and responsible use of contraceptives in wildlife.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of studies on wildlife contraception.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of reported adverse effects across various contraceptive methods.
  • Evaluation of potential risks associated with immunocontraception and vector-delivered agents.

    • Main Results:

    • Numerous adverse effects documented, including reproductive issues (parturition, fertility), physiological changes (hormonal, body weight), behavioral alterations, and pathological reactions (abscesses, toxicity).
    • Immunocontraception raises concerns about potential genetic alterations affecting disease resistance within populations.
    • Using infectious agents as vectors for immunocontraceptives is deemed inadvisable due to risks of novel disease emergence and containment challenges.

    Conclusions:

    • Wildlife contraception requires careful risk-benefit assessment due to a wide range of potential adverse health and ecological impacts.
    • Immunocontraception and vector-based delivery systems warrant extreme caution due to unpredictable population-level consequences.
    • Establishing clear criteria for safe contraceptive use is essential for ethical and effective wildlife management.