Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Published literature on faculty development programs

L N Meurer1, J A Morzinski

  • 1Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA. lmeurer@post.its.mcw.edu

Family Medicine
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-rated health status: a new vital sign for primary care?

WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin·2002
Same author

What is the diagnostic yield of a standardized sequential clinical evaluation of patients presenting to an emergency department with syncope?

The Journal of family practice·2001
Same author

Are topical antibiotics effective in treating bacterial conjunctivitis?

The Journal of family practice·2001
Same author

Treatment of peptic ulcer disease and nonulcer dyspepsia.

The Journal of family practice·2001
Same author

Nurturing students' interest in primary care research through summer training in meta-analysis.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
Same author

Are antidepressants effective in the treatment of fibromyalgia, and is this effect independent of depression?

The Journal of family practice·2001
Same journal

A Practical Framework for Teaching Women's Health Procedures.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the Disrupted Pathway: The Representation Gap for Hispanics/Latinos in Academic Family Medicine Leadership.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Comment on "Redefining Value in Family Medicine Obstetrics: A Pathway to Sustainable Rural Maternity Care".

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

The Power of Presence.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Advancing Hybrid Interviewing: From Bias Concerns to Assessment Quality.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Seeing Beneath the Surface.

Family medicine·2026
See all related articles

Many faculty development program evaluations lack crucial details, hindering future planning. A review found key elements like needs assessment and cost were reported in less than 30% of studies, suggesting a need for standardized reporting.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Program Evaluation
  • Faculty Development

Background:

  • Published faculty development program evaluations frequently lack comprehensive program descriptions.
  • Incomplete reporting makes it challenging for new program planners to replicate or build upon existing initiatives.
  • Existing literature often omits critical components necessary for robust program evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the completeness of program descriptions in published faculty development evaluation articles.
  • To identify the extent to which essential program elements are reported in the literature.
  • To propose a framework for improving future reporting standards.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of faculty development program evaluation articles was conducted.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A model based on Stufflebeam's work was used to examine the inclusion of key program elements.
  • The analysis focused on elements such as needs assessment, leadership support, stakeholder input, barriers, attendance, and cost.

    • Main Results:

    • Many critical program components were infrequently reported.
    • Local needs assessment was discussed in fewer than 30% of articles.
    • Leadership support, stakeholder input, implementation barriers, participant attendance, and cost were also reported in less than 30% of publications.

    Conclusions:

    • Published faculty development program evaluations are often incomplete.
    • Essential elements for program planning and replication are consistently underreported.
    • The Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) framework is recommended to guide future program reporting for enhanced clarity and utility.