Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Future directions for research on faculty development

D M Irby1, F P Hekelman

  • 1Department of Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. irby@u.washington.edu

Family Medicine
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Models of faculty development for problem-based learning.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2013
Same author

Teaching the one-minute preceptor. A randomized controlled trial.

Journal of general internal medicine·2001
Same author

Where have all the preceptors gone? Erosion of the volunteer clinical faculty.

The Western journal of medicine·2001
Same author

Insights from outstanding rural internal medicine residency rotations at the University of Washington.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
Same author

Reforming the core clerkship in internal medicine: the SGIM/CDIM Project. Society of General Internal Medicine/Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine.

Annals of internal medicine·2001
Same author

Does good clinical teaching really make a difference?

The American journal of medicine·2001
Same journal

A Practical Framework for Teaching Women's Health Procedures.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the Disrupted Pathway: The Representation Gap for Hispanics/Latinos in Academic Family Medicine Leadership.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Comment on "Redefining Value in Family Medicine Obstetrics: A Pathway to Sustainable Rural Maternity Care".

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

The Power of Presence.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Advancing Hybrid Interviewing: From Bias Concerns to Assessment Quality.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Seeing Beneath the Surface.

Family medicine·2026
See all related articles

Future faculty development research should prioritize understanding components, linking assessment to outcomes, and exploring evolving roles. Further study is needed on organizational culture and technology integration for effective faculty growth.

Area of Science:

  • Higher Education Research
  • Academic Staff Development
  • Organizational Psychology

Background:

  • Current public policy and prior research highlight the need for focused faculty development.
  • Evolving faculty roles and career paths necessitate a deeper understanding of professional development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify five priority areas for future faculty development research.
  • To provide public policy recommendations for supporting faculty development research.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of current research trends.
  • Analysis of public policy needs related to higher education.

Main Results:

  • Five key research areas identified: faculty development components/strategies, assessment-outcome links, evolving professional development, organizational culture, and technology integration.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Need for greater clarity on faculty development strategies and competencies.
  • Importance of understanding the impact of organizational culture and technology on faculty growth.

    • Conclusions:

    • Fundamental research on faculty development requires collaborative support from government, foundations, and universities.
    • Prioritizing these research areas will enhance faculty effectiveness and institutional vitality.
    • Addressing these priorities is crucial for adapting to the changing landscape of higher education.