Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation

R M DeMay1

  • 1Section of Cytopathology, University of Chicago, Ill 60637-1470, USA.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hyperchromatic crowded groups: pitfalls in pap smear diagnosis.

American journal of clinical pathology·2002
Same author

Should we abandon pap smear testing?

American journal of clinical pathology·2002
Same author

Follicular lesions of the thyroid. W(h)ither follicular carcinoma?

American journal of clinical pathology·2000
Same author

Sjögren's syndrome presenting with a minor salivary gland mass.

The Journal of otolaryngology·1998
Same author

Frozen section of thyroid? Just say no.

American journal of clinical pathology·1998
Same author

Medicolegal issues and fine needle aspiration of the breast. What you can do to decrease your risk of being sued.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·1998

The Papanicolaou smear is a highly effective cervical cancer screening tool, but errors in sample collection and interpretation can lead to false negatives. Inadequate screening remains the primary barrier to preventing cervical cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Cytopathology
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • The Papanicolaou smear (Pap smear) is a cornerstone of cervical cancer prevention.
  • Despite its success, the Pap smear is not infallible and can yield false-negative results.
  • Errors in screening contribute to the persistence of cervical cancer incidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the reasons why the Papanicolaou smear fails to prevent cervical cancer.
  • To highlight common issues in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
  • To underscore the importance of adequate screening in cervical cancer prevention.

Main Methods:

  • Review of Papanicolaou smear limitations.
  • Analysis of common diagnostic and sampling errors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of screening failures in cervical cancer cases.

    • Main Results:

    • Sampling errors are a significant cause of false-negative Papanicolaou smear results.
    • Diagnostic errors can occur even in high-quality cytology laboratories.
    • Failure to adequately screen patients is a more critical issue than test-specific errors.

    Conclusions:

    • While Papanicolaou smear interpretation has challenges, inadequate screening is the leading cause of preventable cervical cancer.
    • Improving screening rates and addressing interpretation issues are crucial for enhancing cervical cancer prevention.
    • The Papanicolaou smear's effectiveness is maximized when screening is comprehensive and accurate.