Related Experiment Videos
On receiving the patient's transference: the symbolizing and desymbolizing countertransference
1Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, USA.
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
|January 1, 1997
Summary
This study observed therapist nonverbal behavior to differentiate empathy from constructive and destructive countertransference. Findings link rhythmic nonverbal cues to empathy and arrhythmicity to countertransference, enhancing therapeutic understanding.
Area of Science:
- Psychotherapy Research
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychoanalysis
Background:
- Distinguishing therapist empathy from countertransference is crucial for effective psychotherapy.
- Understanding the therapist's internal experience, particularly nonverbal cues, offers insight into therapeutic dynamics.
- Previous research relied on retrospective accounts, lacking direct behavioral observation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To empirically delineate the boundaries between therapist empathy and constructive/destructive countertransference.
- To investigate the therapist's nonverbal behavior during listening as an indicator of their internal state.
- To explore the congruence between observed behavior and retrospective self-reports.
Main Methods:
- An empirical study utilizing video recording to analyze therapist nonverbal behavior during sessions.
- Observation of a single therapist in both a "not-so-difficult" and a "difficult" session.
- Analysis of nonverbal behavior rhythmicity (rhythmicity vs. arrhythmicity) to identify distinct experiential modes.
Main Results:
- Three distinct modes of therapist experience were identified: empathy (rhythmicity), symbolizing countertransference (transitory arrhythmicity), and desymbolizing countertransference (continuous arrhythmicity).
- Nonverbal behavior patterns directly correlated with the therapist's subjective experience of the patient.
- Observed behavioral patterns showed congruence with retrospective reconstructions from prior analytic literature.
Conclusions:
- Therapist nonverbal behavior, specifically its rhythmicity, serves as a valid marker for differentiating empathy from countertransference.
- Direct behavioral observation provides a complementary and enhancing method to retrospective analytic accounts.
- These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the therapist's internal world and its manifestation in session.