Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Choosing pressure sore risk assessment tools

¹Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire.

Professional Nurse (London, England)

|March 1, 1997

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Management of anastomotic leak following restorative rectal cancer resection-a multi-centre retrospective audit in Ireland.

Irish journal of medical science·2026

Same author

Members' Feedback After a Spiritual Group Psychotherapy for Inpatient, Residential, and Intensive Treatment (SPIRIT).

International journal of group psychotherapy·2024

Same author

Danish translation and cultural adaptation of the Psoriatic arthritis UnclutteRed screening Evaluation (PURE-4) scale.

Scandinavian journal of rheumatology·2024

Same author

A single dose of dietary nitrate supplementation protects against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in early postmenopausal women.

Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme·2022

Same author

Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor: individual participant data meta-analysis.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2020

Same author

Diagnostic Limitations in Congenital Zika Virus Infection.

Irish medical journal·2020

The validity of common risk assessment scores is uncertain, requiring careful selection for specific clinical settings. More research is needed to link risk predictions with patient support surface choices.

Area of Science:

Clinical assessment
Patient safety
Healthcare research

Background:

The reliability and validity of numerous patient risk assessment scores are not definitively established.
Existing risk assessment tools may have varying applicability across different clinical environments.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the inconclusive validity and reliability of commonly used risk assessment scores.
To explore the relationship between risk status predictions and the selection of patient support surfaces.

Main Methods:

Literature review on risk assessment score validity and reliability.
Analysis of clinical setting suitability for different scores.
Exploration of evidence linking risk prediction to support surface selection.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Inconclusive evidence regarding the validity and reliability of many risk assessment scores.
Identified that some scores are more appropriate for specific clinical contexts.
Lack of research on the connection between risk prediction and patient support surface selection.

Conclusions:

Careful consideration is necessary when selecting risk assessment scores due to variable validity and reliability.
Further investigation is essential to understand how risk predictions should inform the choice of patient support surfaces.