Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
Simon's experiments and stimulus-response compatibility: hypothesis of two automatic responses
1Unité Inserm 302, Hôpital de La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Abstract:
In Simon, Hinrich, and Craft's (1970) experiments, two factors, Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Position of Hands, are manipulated. The effects of these factors are not additive. Effects of Stimulus-Response Compatibility are usually explained by the similarity between the sets of stimuli and responses. This similarity leads us to suggest that, in these particular experimental designs, two automatic responses will be triggered by the presentation of the stimulus and consequently will be associated with two Stimulus-automatic Response mappings. These two mappings are shown to be positively (both Compatible or both Incompatible) or negatively (one is Compatible whereas the other is Incompatible) correlated, depending on the treatment combination of the two factors. Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Position of Hands. Consequently, the effects of Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Position of Hands are suggested not to be additive. The predictions inferred from this model are consistent with experimental data and Simon's conclusion.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
Behaviorism
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
Principles of Classical Conditioning
During the...
Law of Effect
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

