Efficient autoproteolytic processing of the MHV-A59 3C-like proteinase from the flanking hydrophobic domains requires

J D Piñón1, R R Mayreddy, J D Turner

  • 1Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104-6076, USA.

Virology
|April 14, 1997
PubMed

Insights

The coronavirus MHV-A59 3C-like proteinase (3CLpro) mediates its own cleavage from flanking hydrophobic regions. Membrane association of hydrophobic domains enhances this autoproteolytic processing, crucial for viral replication.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • The replicase gene of Murine Hepatitis Virus strain A59 (MHV-A59) encodes a serine-like proteinase, 3C-like proteinase (3CLpro).
  • This proteinase domain is flanked by hydrophobic regions, potentially involved in membrane association.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the autoproteolytic processing of the MHV-A59 3CLpro.
  • To determine the role of flanking hydrophobic regions and microsomal membranes in 3CLpro processing.

Main Methods:

  • Cell-free expression of plasmids encoding 3CLpro and flanking regions.
  • In vitro translation with canine pancreatic microsomes.
  • Proteolysis inhibition assays using N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) and mutagenesis.
  • Membrane association assays and identification of proteolytic products using a viral epitope tag.

Main Results:

  • 3CLpro undergoes autoproteolytic cleavage from flanking domains, confirmed by NEM inhibition and mutagenesis.
  • Processing efficiency is enhanced by canine pancreatic microsomes or removal of one hydrophobic domain.
  • Microsomal membranes did not enhance trans-processing by recombinant 3CLpro.
  • Hydrophobic domains associate with membranes, while 3CLpro is largely soluble; a 22-kDa membrane-associated product contains the N-terminal hydrophobic domain.

Conclusions:

  • MHV-A59 3CLpro is responsible for its autoproteolytic cleavage.
  • Membrane association of hydrophobic domains influences processing efficiency.
  • Understanding this processing is key to viral replication mechanisms.

Related Concept Videos

Molecular Chaperones and Protein Folding03:00

Molecular Chaperones and Protein Folding

The native conformation of a protein is formed by interactions between the side chains of its constituent amino acids. When the amino acids cannot form these interactions, the protein cannot fold by itself and needs chaperones. Notably, chaperones do not relay any additional information required for the folding of polypeptides; the native conformation of a protein is determined solely by its amino acid sequence. Chaperones catalyze protein folding without being a part of the folded protein.
The...
Mitochondrial Precursor Proteins01:39

Mitochondrial Precursor Proteins

Mitochondrial precursors are partially unfolded or loosely folded polypeptide chains. Newly synthesized precursors are inhibited from spontaneously folding into their native conformation by the cytosolic chaperones, heat shock proteins 70 (Hsp70), and mitochondrial import stimulation factors (MSFs). Precursors bound to MSFs are guided to the TOM70-TOM37 receptors, while precursors bound to Hsp70  chaperones are targetted to TOM20-TOM22 receptor complexes.
Most of the mitochondrial precursors...
Translocation of Proteins into the Mitochondria01:19

Translocation of Proteins into the Mitochondria

Mitochondrial precursors are translocated to the internal subcompartments via independent mechanisms involving distinct protein machineries called translocases.
Sorting of outer membrane proteins:
Mitochondrial outer membrane proteins are of two types: the transmembrane, beta-barrel porins, and the membrane-anchored, alpha-helical proteins. Beta-barrel porin precursors are translocated by the TOM complex and inserted into the outer mitochondrial membrane by the SAM complex. In contrast,...
Protein Transport into the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane01:34

Protein Transport into the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane

Nuclear encoded mitochondrial precursors are imported to the inner membrane in a multistep process involving two separate translocons, TIM22 and TIM23. TIM23 is a cation-selective pore that remains closed by the N terminal segment of the protein. Negative charges on the TIM23 act as a receptor for the incoming precursor, pulling the positively charged matrix-targeting sequence for peptide insertion and translocation.
Transport of mitochondrial precursors across the TIM23 channel is driven by...
Insertion of Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER01:29

Insertion of Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER

The rough ER membrane synthesizes, assembles, and embeds transmembrane proteins in diverse topologies. These proteins function as transporters or channels and can remain in the ER membrane or are sent to the Golgi complex, lysosome, and cell membrane.
The multipass transmembrane proteins are the type IV integral membrane proteins with multiple topogenic sequences determining their spatial arrangement in the ER membrane. Nearly all multipass proteins lack a cleavable signal sequence and use...
Export of Misfolded Proteins out of the ER01:32

Export of Misfolded Proteins out of the ER

After folding, the ER assesses the quality of secretory and membrane proteins. The correctly folded proteins are cleared by the calnexin cycle for transport to their final destination, while misfolded proteins are held back in the ER lumen. The ER chaperones attempt to unfold and refold the misfolded proteins but sometimes fail to achieve the correct native conformation. Such terminally misfolded proteins are then exported to the cytosol by ER-associated degradation or ERAD pathway for...