NADP-dependent enzymes. II: Evolution of the mono- and dinucleotide binding domains

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides [NAD and NADP with both referred to as NAD(P)] are among the more diffuse redox cofactors. Despite their stereochemical similarity where the only difference is a phosphomonoester on the ribose near the adenine of NADP, they show different biochemical reactivities with NAD behaving as an oxidant and NADP as a reductant. NAD(P)-dependent enzymes generally share a common open alpha/beta fold with few exceptions only recently structurally characterized. This study of the molecular evolution of the NAD(P) binding domains, possible given the large number of known molecular structures, addresses two main questions: 1) can a common fold exist in different biological systems (divergent evolution) and 2) does a relationship exist among similar biological systems that display different folds (convergent evolution)? Both the structures of mono- and dinucleotide binding domains have been classified by cluster analysis based on the similarity evaluated by their main chain C alpha superposition. Moreover, the cofactor conformations and the stereochemical characteristics of their pockets have also been classified by analogous methods on the basis of the published tertiary structures. Two primary results appear: 1) the classification of the mononucleotide binding domains is different from that of the dinucleotide binding folds and 2) both divergent and convergent evolutionary pathways can be hypothesized, the latter less frequently observed and less pronounced but nevertheless evident. The generally accepted hypothesis that dinucleotide binding domains have evolved by gene duplication of primordial genes coding for the smaller mononucleotide binding domains is acceptable but the two halves of the resulting dinucleotide binding domains are evolutionarily uncorrelated. The NH2-terminal mononucleotide binding domain is less variable than the COOH-terminal half, probably because it involves the binding of the ADP moiety of NAD(P) invariant in all examined systems. There is evidence to postulate that evolutionary pathways for NAD(P)-dependent enzymes are both divergent and convergent. In fact, nearly all combinations of similarity dissimilarity in overall fold, cofactor conformation, and cofactor binding pocket structural characteristics for each enzyme pair examined are possible. The NAD(P)-dependent enzymes apparently provide a canonical example of an evolutionary principle that "anything goes."