Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Thoughts on quality-control systems: a laboratorian's perspective

G S Cembrowski1

  • 1GSC Consulting, Edina, MN 55424, USA. cembr001@gold.tc.umn.edu

Clinical Chemistry
|May 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low sensitivity of anion gap to detect clinically significant lactic acidosis in the emergency department.

Clinical biochemistry·2017
Same author

Combination therapy with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and a proton pump inhibitor restores normoglycaemia in non-obese diabetic mice.

Diabetologia·2009
Same author

Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: proposed guidelines to improve accuracy.

The Diabetes educator·2002
Same author

Fructosamine, III: Prologue or epitaph?

Diabetes technology & therapeutics·2001
Same author

Medical allowable imprecision in measuring urinary metanephrines.

Clinical biochemistry·2001
Same author

Postanalytical quality improvement: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of elevated calcium results in 525 institutions.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2000
Same journal

Comparison of Information-Dependent Acquisition and Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra for Untargeted Drug Testing on a Linear Ion Trap-Pulsing Quadrupole-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Patterns of One-Year Change in HbA1c and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Metrics in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

TSH Pediatric Reference Intervals: Lack of CALIPER Applicability to US-Based Populations.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Rapid Detection of Hemoglobinopathy Variants Using One-Step Library Preparation and Nanopore Sequencing.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Editor's Note: Circulating Proteolytic Products of Carboxypeptidase N for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

In Reply to Reflexing NT-proBNP for sFlt-1/PlGF Ratios That Fall into the Measurement Uncertainty for Preeclampsia Risk Classification.

Clinical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Implementing analyte-specific quality control limits in clinical laboratories reduces false rejections and reporting delays. This approach enhances efficiency by optimizing quality control procedures for medical diagnostics.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Current prospective quality-control systems rely on medically relevant, analyte-specific control limits.
  • Traditional laboratory limits may lead to false rejections or missed errors.
  • Optimizing quality control is crucial for accurate and timely diagnostic reporting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the benefits of analyte-specific quality control limits.
  • To describe patient data quality-control algorithms.
  • To present a systematic approach for converting to efficient quality control procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing analyte-specific quality control limits, both broader and narrower than general laboratory limits.
  • Describing patient data quality-control algorithms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Suggesting systematic retrospective review of proficiency data.
  • Presenting an approach for converting to analyte-specific quality control.

    • Main Results:

    • Broader analyte-specific limits decrease false rejections, unnecessary reanalyses, and reporting delays.
    • Narrower analyte-specific limits increase error detection but risk identifying uncontrollable errors.
    • The study outlines methods for quality control algorithm implementation and data review.

    Conclusions:

    • Analyte-specific quality control limits offer improved efficiency and accuracy in clinical laboratories.
    • A conservative approach is recommended when adopting manufacturer guidelines for quality control testing.
    • The study provides a framework for transitioning to optimized, analyte-specific quality control procedures.