Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026
09:29
A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
Published on: February 11, 2014
Evaluating the value of low-vision services
T W Raasch1, S J Leat, R N Kleinstein
1College of Optometry, Ohio state University, Columbus, 43210, USA.
Journal of the American Optometric Association
|May 1, 1997
Summary
Low-vision interventions significantly benefit patients, improving daily life. Evaluating this impact presents challenges, highlighting the need for better outcome measurement tools in optometric research.
Area of Science:
- Optometry
- Ophthalmology
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- Low-vision care is a recognized and valued optometric service.
- Evaluating the outcomes of low-vision care is crucial for its integration into healthcare systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the literature on the prevalence and impact of low vision.
- To examine how low-vision interventions affect individuals with visual impairments.
- To explore methods for evaluating the impact of low-vision care.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review.
- Analysis of studies on low vision prevalence, impact, and intervention outcomes.
- Examination of evaluation methodologies for low-vision care.
Main Results:
- Low-vision interventions are highly valued by patients and significantly impact daily life.
- Quantifying the broad outcomes of low-vision care presents a considerable evaluation challenge.
Conclusions:
- Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment is a valuable approach for outcome evaluation.
- Standardized HRQoL instruments should be applied to the visually impaired population.
- Further optometric research is needed to address unresolved issues in outcome evaluation.
