Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Evaluating In Vitro DNA Damage Using Comet Assay
10:43

Evaluating In Vitro DNA Damage Using Comet Assay

Published on: October 11, 2017

[Comparative study of three antineoplastic alkylating agents on DNA]

Iu S Babaian, N V Khudaverdian, L G Karapetian

    Biofizika
    |March 1, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary

    Cyclophosphane demonstrated superior anticancer effects with fewer side effects on liver DNA compared to phosphamide and sarcolysine. This alkylating agent is preferred for cancer treatment due to its targeted efficacy and reduced toxicity.

    More Related Videos

    Formation of Covalent DNA Adducts by Enzymatically Activated Carcinogens and Drugs In Vitro and Their Determination by 32P-postlabeling09:33

    Formation of Covalent DNA Adducts by Enzymatically Activated Carcinogens and Drugs In Vitro and Their Determination by 32P-postlabeling

    Published on: March 20, 2018

    Comet Assay to Quantify DNA Damage in FLT3 Mutant-expressing 32D Cells after Exposure to Type I and Type II FLT3 Inhibitors04:36

    Comet Assay to Quantify DNA Damage in FLT3 Mutant-expressing 32D Cells after Exposure to Type I and Type II FLT3 Inhibitors

    Published on: October 17, 2025

    Related Concept Videos

    DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle02:36

    DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle

    In response to DNA damage, cells can pause the cell cycle to assess and repair the breaks. However, the cell must check the DNA at certain critical stages during the cell cycle. If the cell cycle pauses before DNA replication, the cells will contain twice the amount of DNA. On the other hand, if cells arrest after DNA replication but before mitosis, they will contain four times the normal amount of DNA. With a host of specialized proteins at their disposal,cells must use the right protein at...
    Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

    Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

    Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...