Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic reviews: what do they involve?

K Bannigan1, J Droogan, V Entwistle

  • 1NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York.

Nursing Times
|April 6, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical, legal, and social issues in health technology assessment for prenatal/preconceptional and newborn screening: a workshop report.

Public health genomics·2008
Same author

Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2007
Same author

Women's perceptions of decision-making about hysterectomy.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2004
Same author

Interventions for improving communication with children and adolescents about a family member's cancer.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2003
Same author

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2003
Same author

Discussing wisdom teeth with patients: a critique of information materials.

Health bulletin·2003
Same journal

'The little things count': delivering dignified care.

Nursing times·2018
Same journal

The heart of the hospital.

Nursing times·2018
Same journal

The nurse's role in caring for people with dementia.

Nursing times·2018
Same journal

Hepatitis C and the ongoing challenge of genotype 3.

Nursing times·2018
Same journal

Implementing change in older people's acute care.

Nursing times·2018
Same journal

A total health economy approach to revalidation.

Nursing times·2018
See all related articles

This article outlines the essential steps for conducting systematic reviews, a crucial method for synthesizing research evidence. Learn how to identify topics, search literature, select studies, and analyze findings effectively.

Area of Science:

  • Evidence-based practice
  • Research methodology
  • Health sciences literature

Background:

  • Systematic reviews are vital for evidence-based practice.
  • They synthesize existing research to inform clinical decisions.
  • Identifying research gaps is a key outcome.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of systematic review methodology.
  • To guide researchers and practitioners in conducting systematic reviews.
  • To highlight the key stages involved in the review process.

Main Methods:

  • Literature search strategy development.
  • Study selection criteria and screening processes.
  • Data extraction and synthesis techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A structured approach to conducting systematic reviews.
  • Identification of critical steps from topic selection to synthesis.
  • Emphasis on rigorous and transparent methodology.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic reviews are fundamental for advancing scientific knowledge.
  • Effective methodology ensures reliable and reproducible findings.
  • This article serves as a foundational guide for conducting systematic reviews.