Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Signed rank statistics for coherent predictions

P R Rosenbaum1

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6302, USA.

Biometrics
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Matching One Sample According to Two Criteria in Observational Studies.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2023
Same author

Development of a measure of family-centred care for resource-poor South African settings: the experience of using a modified version of the MPOC-20.

Child: care, health and development·2008
Same author

Matching and thick description in an observational study of mortality after surgery.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2003
Same author

Multivariate matching and bias reduction in the surgical outcomes study.

Medical care·2001
Same author

Reduced sensitivity to hidden bias at upper quantiles in observational studies with dilated treatment effects.

Biometrics·2001
Same author

Substantial gains in bias reduction from matching with a variable number of controls.

Biometrics·2000
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

A new statistical test generalizes Wilcoxon's signed rank test for dose-response studies. It helps distinguish treatment effects from bias in observational data, strengthening evidence of cause and effect.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Dose-response relationships are crucial in observational studies and nonrandomized experiments.
  • Distinguishing true treatment effects from hidden biases remains a significant challenge.
  • Existing methods may not adequately address multiple outcomes or quantify evidence strength.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a generalized Wilcoxon's signed rank test for analyzing dose-response relationships with multiple outcomes.
  • To develop a sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of findings against hidden biases.
  • To quantify the evidence for cause and effect in the presence of potential confounding.

Main Methods:

  • Generalization of Wilcoxon's signed rank test for dose-response analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development and application of a sensitivity analysis for hidden bias.
  • Examination of the formal properties and power of the proposed test.
  • Consideration of conditions for optimal test resemblance and impact of violations.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed test and sensitivity analysis quantify the coherence of associations and strength of evidence for causality.
    • The optimal test form was determined but is not practically usable due to unknown parameters.
    • Conditions under which the proposed test approximates the optimal test were identified.
    • The impact of violated assumptions on statistical power was evaluated.

    Conclusions:

    • The generalized test and sensitivity analysis provide a robust framework for evaluating dose-response relationships in the presence of potential biases.
    • This approach enhances the ability to infer causality from observational and nonrandomized studies.
    • The methodology offers a quantitative measure of evidence strength, aiding in the interpretation of treatment effects.