Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

UK breast screening programme: how does it reflect the Forrest recommendations?

K Gerard1, J Brown, K Johnston

  • 1School of Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Journal of Medical Screening
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning disabilities. Adapt and survive.

Nursing times·1992
Same author

Intracellular regulation of cell adhesion to extracellular matrix components in murine B16 melanoma cells.

Melanoma research·1992
Same author

The effect of chewing gum use on in situ enamel lesion remineralization.

Journal of dental research·1992
Same author

Pick's disease.

Bailliere's clinical neurology·1992
Same author

A prospective cytogenetic study of 36 cases of DiGeorge syndrome.

American journal of human genetics·1992
Same author

Beliefs and behavioral intentions regarding human immunodeficiency virus testing among New York City runaways.

The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine·1992

The UK breast screening programme aligns with Forrest Report frequency guidelines but diverges on double reading and two-view screening. Further research is needed on cost-effectiveness and variations in assessment procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Radiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • The Forrest Report (1986) established key recommendations for the UK's breast screening programme.
  • Evaluating adherence to these recommendations is crucial for optimizing breast cancer detection and patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the current UK breast screening programme's alignment with the 1986 Forrest Report guidelines.
  • Identify areas of concordance and divergence in screening practices.

Main Methods:

  • A postal survey was conducted among 97 UK breast screening programmes.
  • Data collected focused on screening frequency, mammogram reading protocols, assessment procedures, staffing, and equipment utilization.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Programmes generally adhere to triennial screening intervals recommended by Forrest.
  • Significant divergence observed in the adoption of double reading (88% use) and two-view screening for all women (14% use/intend).
  • Budgetary allocation for multidisciplinary teams and variations in assessment visit protocols were also noted.

Conclusions:

  • While screening frequency aligns with Forrest recommendations, deviations exist in double reading, two-view screening policies, and multidisciplinary team staffing.
  • Further research is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of current practices, including double reading and variations in assessment procedures.