Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Comparison of open and laparoscopic appendectomy]

Z Perko1, Z Cala, D Kosuta

  • 1Kirurska klinika, Opća bolnica Sveti Duh, Zagreb.

Lijecnicki Vjesnik
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe as open surgery but offers faster recovery and fewer infections. While more expensive, this minimally invasive approach provides better cosmetic results and quicker return to work, making it the recommended surgical option.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Artificial Intelligence Dose Engine for Fast Carbon Ion Treatment Planning.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same author

Probabilistic proton treatment planning: a novel approach for optimizing underdosage and overdosage probabilities of target and organ structures.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Duodenocolic fistula healing by pentadecapeptide BPC 157 in rats. A cytoprotection viewpoint.

Journal of physiology and pharmacology : an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society·2024
Same author

Optimal combined proton-photon therapy schemes based on the standard BED model.

Physics in medicine and biology·2019
Same author

[ACUTE PAIN MANAGEMENT IN PATIENT ON OPIOID SUBSTITUTION THERAPY WITH METHADONE OR BUPRENORPHINE].

Acta medica Croatica : casopis Hravatske akademije medicinskih znanosti·2017
Same author

Trocar for laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter.

Surgical endoscopy·2017

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • The first laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 1982, sparking ongoing debate regarding its efficacy compared to traditional open surgery.
  • Numerous studies have presented varied modifications and outcomes for laparoscopic appendectomy.
  • Comparative analyses of surgical techniques are crucial for optimizing patient care and surgical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To retrospectively compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy.
  • To analyze key parameters including cost, hospital stay duration, and postoperative recovery.
  • To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and patient experience of both surgical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study comparing fifty patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy versus fifty patients undergoing open appendectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Laparoscopic procedures utilized a "two-handed" technique with varied methods for appendix and mesoappendix management.
  • Endoscopic linear cutters were employed in a subset of laparoscopic procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy demonstrated equal safety to open surgery, with significant advantages in reduced postoperative pain, lower wound infection rates, and shorter hospital stays.
    • Patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures experienced faster recovery and a quicker return to work.
    • The laparoscopic approach resulted in better cosmetic outcomes but was associated with higher initial costs.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy is a superior alternative to open appendectomy, offering significant patient benefits despite higher costs.
    • The advantages of reduced pain, infection, and faster recovery support the recommendation of laparoscopic appendectomy.
    • Further adoption of laparoscopic appendectomy is encouraged for improved surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.