Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Treatment matching. Theoretic basis and practical implications

D R Gastfriend1, A T McLellan

  • 1Addiction Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

The Medical Clinics of North America
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Injectable extended-release naltrexone for opioid dependence: an open label study of long-term safety and efficacy].

Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova·2015
Same author

[Injectable extended-release naltrexone for opioid dependence: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre randomized trial].

Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova·2012
Same author

Impact of psychosocial treatments on associated problems of cocaine-dependent patients.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2001
Same author

Moving toward a "third generation" of contingency management studies in the abuse treatment field: comment on Silverman et al. (2001).

Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology·2001
Same author

Suggested specifications for a standardized Addiction Severity Index database.

Journal of substance abuse treatment·2001
Same author

Can the Treatment Services Review be used to estimate the costs of addiction and ancillary services?

Journal of substance abuse·2001
Same journal

Care Transitions Continue to Evolve.

The Medical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Navigating the Gaps: A Comprehensive Overview of Care Transitions Across the Continuum.

The Medical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Care Transitions and Value-Based Payment Models in the United States.

The Medical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Technology and Innovation in Care Transitions: Imagining the Future of Postdischarge Care.

The Medical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Primary Care, Specialists, and Hospitals: Bridging the Gaps in Communication and Coordination.

The Medical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Social Determinants of Health: Unique Considerations in Transitions of Care.

The Medical clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Developing effective treatment matching for alcohol and drug abuse is crucial. Individualized patient care uses numerous variables, but more empirical data is needed to refine these methods for better addiction services.

Area of Science:

  • Addiction Medicine
  • Psychiatry
  • Public Health

Background:

  • A robust knowledge base exists for treatment matching in alcohol and drug abuse.
  • Numerous variables, including demographics, substance use patterns, and psychosocial factors, can guide individualized treatment.
  • Formal patient placement criteria, like the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) criteria, are evolving.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current state of treatment matching for substance use disorders.
  • To highlight the importance of individualized patient care in addiction treatment.
  • To discuss the need for empirical data to support treatment matching approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing knowledge base and identified matching variables.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the evolution of patient placement criteria.
  • Examination of the current reliance on consensus versus empirical data in treatment matching.
  • Main Results:

    • Treatment matching for substance use disorders utilizes a wide array of patient variables.
    • Current matching relies more on expert consensus than empirical evidence.
    • Sophistication in psychosocial treatment matching study technology is increasing.

    Conclusions:

    • Individualized treatment matching for substance use disorders is supported by extensive variables.
    • Further development and validation of empirical matching data are essential.
    • Advancing treatment matching is vital for improving addiction services quality and accessibility amidst cost pressures.