Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Septic shock

J A Carcillo1, R E Cunnion

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Critical Care Clinics
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Despite advances in understanding septic shock, bedside management remains supportive, with high mortality rates in both pediatric and adult patients. This review highlights similarities, differences, and novel therapeutic investigations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences between adult and pediatric septic shock.

Minerva anestesiologica·2011
Same author

Extracellular heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60) levels in children with septic shock.

Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]·2007
Same author

Plasma filtration on mediators of thrombotic microangiopathy: an in vitro study.

The International journal of artificial organs·2007
Same author

Procalcitonin does discriminate between sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Archives of disease in childhood·2005
Same author

Plasma therapies in thrombotic syndromes.

The International journal of artificial organs·2005
Same author

Cardiac failure in hemolytic uremic syndrome and rescue with extracorporeal life support.

Pediatric cardiology·2004
Same journal

Critical Care and Contagion: Evolving Frontiers of Infectious Diseases in the Modern Intensive Care Unit.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Advances and Challenges in Sepsis Care in Low-Resource Settings.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

The Respiratory Triple Pandemic in the Intensive Care Unit: Epidemiology, Clinical Features and Management of COVID-19, Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Antibiotic Stewardship for the Intensivist.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Infection Prevention and Control in the Intensive Care Unit.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Antibiotic Considerations in the Critically Ill: Empiric Choices and Dosing.

Critical care clinics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Pediatric and Adult Septic Shock Pathophysiology
  • Translational Research in Sepsis

Background:

  • Growing molecular understanding of septic shock contrasts with stagnant bedside management over two decades.
  • Current treatment remains primarily supportive, leading to persistently high morbidity and mortality.
  • Significant similarities and subtle differences exist between pediatric and adult septic shock presentations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the major similarities and minor differences in pediatric and adult septic shock.
  • To emphasize current clinical management practices for septic shock.
  • To discuss recent clinical investigations into novel therapeutic strategies for septic shock.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of current clinical practice in septic shock management.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of recent clinical investigations and trials for novel septic shock therapies.
  • Comparative review focusing on pediatric versus adult septic shock characteristics.
  • Main Results:

    • Treatment for both pediatric and adult septic shock remains largely supportive.
    • Despite gradual improvements, morbidity and mortality rates in septic shock remain high.
    • Key similarities and minor differences between pediatric and adult septic shock are identified.

    Conclusions:

    • Current bedside management of septic shock has seen minimal change despite increased molecular insights.
    • There is an urgent need for more effective therapeutic interventions beyond supportive care.
    • Further research into novel therapies is crucial for improving outcomes in pediatric and adult septic shock.